论文标题

Gaia DR3中的相螺旋

The phase spiral in Gaia DR3

论文作者

Antoja, T., Ramos, P., García-Conde, B., Bernet, M., Laporte, C. F. P., Katz, D.

论文摘要

我们的目标是使用Gaia DR3以银河系(MW)研究相螺旋。我们使用边缘检测算法来找到相螺旋的边界,使我们能够在不同位置和不同的选择下稳健地量化其形状。我们通过确定相螺旋的不同转弯并使用常用MW电位模型的垂直频率来计算相结合的发作时间。我们发现,相位螺旋延伸至$ -1.2 $ kpc的高度以下(薄盘的3至5比例高度),超过$ \ pm 50 $ km/s的$ v_z $。当通过方位角速度和计数投影颜色时,我们看到一个次级分支主要在正垂直速度处。我们还发现具有角动量和方位角的相螺旋的复杂变化。所有这些可能提供了多种扰动(来自不同时间或不同的遗物)和/或相混合过程的复杂性的证据。我们从银河中心检测到从6至11 kpc的相螺旋,并找到超过该范围以外的1-2 kpc的垂直不对称的特征。我们用方位角测量较小但清晰的变化。当我们在不同的角动量上确定相位螺旋的相位混合时间,并使用不同的螺旋转弯(以不同的$ z $)来确定具有系统差异的不一致时间(随着$ | l_z | $而增加,$ | z | $)。我们的确定主要在[0.3-0.9] GYR的范围内,平均为0.5 GYR。当使用不同的常规潜在模型,不同的动力学温度的不同恒星距离或频率时,这些不一致不会发生变化。它们可能源于潜在模型与真实MW的不一致性,以及过于简单的建模,特别是忽略了自我实力,而不是考虑多重扰动和对其他过程的干扰。

We aim to study the phase spiral in the Milky Way (MW) with Gaia DR3. We used an edge detection algorithm to find the border of the phase spiral, allowing us to robustly quantify its shape at different positions and for different selections. We calculated the time of onset of the phase-mixing by determining the different turns of the phase spiral and using the vertical frequencies from commonly used MW potential models. We find that the phase spiral extends down to $-1.2$ kpc in height below the plane (about 3 to 5 scale heights of the thin disc) and beyond $\pm 50$ km/s in $V_Z$. We see a secondary branch mostly at positive vertical velocities when coloured by azimuthal velocity and in the counts projection. We also find complex variations of the phase spirals with angular momentum and azimuth. All these possibly provide evidence of multiple perturbations (from different times or from different perturbers) and/or of the complexity of the phase mixing process. We detect the phase spiral from 6 to 11 kpc from the Galactic centre and find signatures of vertical asymmetries 1-2 kpc beyond this range. We measure small but clear variations with azimuth. When we determine the phase mixing times from the phase spiral at different angular momenta and using the different spiral turns (at different $Z$) we obtain inconsistent times with systematic differences (times increasing with $|L_Z|$ and with $|Z|$). Our determinations are mostly in the range of [0.3-0.9] Gyr, with an average of 0.5 Gyr. The inconsistencies do not change when using different usual potential models, different stellar distances or frequencies for different kinetic temperatures. They could stem from the inconsistency of potential models with the true MW, and from too simple modelling, in particular neglecting self-gravity, not considering the multiple perturbations and the interference with other processes.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源