论文标题

尽管具有多项式能量的恒定能量间隙,但量子退火显示出指数级的成功概率

Quantum annealing showing an exponentially small success probability despite a constant energy gap with polynomial energy

论文作者

Hayasaka, Hiroshi, Imoto, Takashi, Matsuzaki, Yuichiro, Kawabata, Shiro

论文摘要

量子退火(QA)是解决组合优化问题的方法。我们可以使用绝热条件估算质量检查的计算时间。绝热条件由两个部分组成:能量差距和过渡矩阵。过去的大多数研究都集中在能量差距和计算时间之间的关系上。质量保证的成功概率被认为是由于在一阶相变点处呈指数降低的能量隙而呈指数降低。在这项研究中,通过详细分析了质量保证,质量保险矩阵,过渡矩阵和计算成本之间的关系,我们提出了一种构建违反直觉模型的通用方法,其中具有恒定退火时间的QA尽管基于多项式能量的恒定能量差距,但持续退火的时间会失败。我们假设总哈密顿量的能量最多是$θ(l)$,其中$ l $是Qubits的数量。在我们的形式主义中,我们选择了一个已知的模型,该模型在质量保证期间表现出指数较小的能量差距,并通过向哈密顿式添加特定的罚款项来修改模型。在修改模型中,绝热条件下的过渡矩阵随着量子数的数量增加而变为指数,而能量差距保持恒定。此外,我们达到了二次加速,为此,在绝热条件下改善的上限由多项式能量确定。作为示例,我们考虑了绝热的Grover搜索和$ P $ -SPIN模型。在这些情况下,随着惩罚项的增加,尽管尽管存在恒定的能量差距,但质量检查模型上质量检查的成功概率呈指数较小。我们可以达到比常规质量检查的成功概率要高得多。此外,与常规质量保证相比,我们从数值上显示计算成本的缩放量四倍地提高。

Quantum annealing (QA) is a method for solving combinatorial optimization problems. We can estimate the computational time for QA using the adiabatic condition. The adiabatic condition consists of two parts: an energy gap and a transition matrix. Most past studies have focused on the relationship between the energy gap and computational time. The success probability of QA is considered to decrease exponentially owing to the exponentially decreasing energy gap at the first-order phase-transition point. In this study, through a detailed analysis of the relationship between the energy gap, transition matrix, and computational cost during QA, we propose a general method for constructing counterintuitive models wherein QA with a constant annealing time fails despite a constant energy gap, based on polynomial energy. We assume that the energy of the total Hamiltonian is at most $Θ(L)$, where $L$ is the number of qubits. In our formalism, we choose a known model that exhibits an exponentially small energy gap during QA, and modify the model by adding a specific penalty term to the Hamiltonian. In the modified model, the transition matrix in the adiabatic condition becomes exponentially large as the number of qubits increases, while the energy gap remains constant. Moreover, we achieve a quadratic speedup, for which the upper bound for improvement in the adiabatic condition is determined by the polynomial energy. As examples, we consider the adiabatic Grover search and the $p$-spin model. In these cases, with the addition of the penalty term, although the success probability of QA on the modified models becomes exponentially small despite a constant energy gap; we can achieve a success probability considerably higher than that of conventional QA. Moreover, we numerically show the scaling of the computational cost is quadratically improved compared to the conventional QA.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源