论文标题

比较基于多代理系统的流体系统分布式控制的方法

Comparing Approaches to Distributed Control of Fluid Systems based on Multi-Agent Systems

论文作者

Logan, Kevin T., Stürmer, J. Marius, Müller, Tim M., Pelz, Peter F.

论文摘要

流体系统的常规控制并不考虑全系统知识来优化节能操作。流体系统的分布式控制结合了可靠的局部控制组件,同时使用全系统合作来确保节能运行。提出的工作比较了基于多代理系统,分布式模型预测控制(DMPC),多代理深入强化学习(MADRL)和市场机理设计的三种分布式控制方法。这些方法应用于通用流体系统,并对功能,节能操作,建模工作,面对破坏的可靠性以及控制决策的透明度进行了评估。尽管确定了功能质量和能源效率之间的权衡,但所有方法都显示出符合功能。证明增加的建模工作可以稍微改善性能,而通过过度信息共享引起的信息的强烈相互依存已被证明是不利的。与市场机制相比,DMPC和部分可观察到的MADRL对中断不太敏感。总之,基于代理的流体系统的控制要比常规方法实现更高的能效,其值类似于集中式最佳控制,因此代表了流体系统控制的可行设计方法。

Conventional control of fluid systems does not consider system-wide knowledge for optimising energy efficient operation. Distributed control of fluid systems combines reliable local control of components while using system-wide cooperation to ensure energy efficient operation. The presented work compares three approaches to distributed control based on multi-agent systems, distributed model predictive control (DMPC), multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (MADRL) and market mechanism design. These approaches were applied to a generic fluid system and evaluated with regard to functionality, energy efficient operation, modeling effort, reliability in the face of disruptions, and transparency of control decisions. All approaches were shown to fulfil the functionality, though a trade-off between functional quality and energy efficiency was identified. Increased modeling effort was shown to improve the performance slightly while a strong interdependence of information caused by excessive information sharing has proven to be disadvantageous. DMPC and partially observable MADRL were less sensitive to disruptions than market mechanism. In conclusion, agent-based control of fluid systems achieves greater energy efficiency than conventional methods, with values similar to centralized optimal control and thus represent a viable design approach of fluid system control.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源