论文标题

$^{176} $ lu $^+$ $时钟比较$ 10^{ - 18} $级别通过相关光谱

$^{176}$Lu$^+$ clock comparison at the $10^{-18}$ level via correlation spectroscopy

论文作者

Zhiqiang, Zhang, Arnold, Kyle J., Kaewuam, Rattakorn, Barrett, M. D.

论文摘要

我们在实验中证明了使用相关光谱范围的两个$^{176} $ lu $^+$频率参考之间的一致性。从不同磁场的比较中,我们获得了二次Zeeman系数$ -4.89264(88)\,\ Mathrm {Hz/Mt^2} $,该$ 2.5 \ times 10^{ - 20} $的相应分数频率不确定性贡献在典型的手术和0.1的比较$ 2.5 \ times 10^{-20} $ 0.1 c。随后与两个系统在0.1 \ mt处进行比较,演示了$(-2.0 \ pm(3.7)_ \ Mathrm {stat} \ pm(0.9)_ \ mathrm {sys})\ pm(3.7)_ \ mathrm {sys})\ times10^{-18} $,s stat stat'和sys的统计信息,并在systanticalsitive and Indicative and Indication and Incestion and Incestion and Incection and Incection and Incection and Incection,

We experimentally demonstrate agreement between two $^{176}$Lu$^+$ frequency references using correlation spectroscopy. From a comparison at different magnetic fields, we obtain a quadratic Zeeman coefficient of $-4.89264(88)\,\mathrm{Hz/mT^2}$, which gives a corresponding fractional frequency uncertainty contribution of just $2.5\times 10^{-20}$ for comparisons at typical operating fields of 0.1\,mT. A subsequent comparison with both systems at 0.1\,mT, demonstrates a fractional frequency difference of $(-2.0\pm(3.7)_\mathrm{stat}\pm(0.9)_\mathrm{sys})\times10^{-18}$, where `stat' and `sys' indicate statistical and systematic uncertainty, respectively.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源