论文标题

您的探测器有多快?时间响应对图像质量的影响

How Fast is Your Detector? The Effect of Temporal Response on Image Quality

论文作者

Mullarkey, Tiarnan, Geever, Matthew, Peters, Jonathan J. P., Griffiths, Ian, Nellist, Peter D., Jones, Lewys

论文摘要

随着对高速成像的兴趣,人们对扫描透射电子显微镜(STEM)检测器的响应时间的兴趣增加。先前的工作先前已经突出了各种检测器的定量组成或结构研究的性能,但是在这里我们将重点转移到了检测器时间响应上,并且对捕获的图像产生了影响。报道了八个探测器的单电子反应的上升和衰减时间,以及测量其平坦,圆度,光滑度和椭圆度的测量。我们开发并应用了将时间探测器响应纳入模拟中的方法,这表明在图像及其傅立叶变换中显而易见分辨率损失。我们得出的结论是,固态检测器的表现优于所有区域中基于光电倍增管(PMT)检测器的椭圆形中心孔稍微少一些,并且很可能是大多数应用中使用的最佳检测器。但是,使用此处介绍的工具,我们鼓励用户有效评估哪种检测器最适合其实验需求。

With increasing interest in high-speed imaging should come an increased interest in the response times of our scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM) detectors. Previous works have previously highlighted and contrasted performance of various detectors for quantitative compositional or structural studies, but here we shift the focus to detector temporal response, and the effect this has on captured images. The rise and decay times of eight detectors' single electron response are reported, as well as measurements of their flatness, roundness, smoothness, and ellipticity. We develop and apply a methodology for incorporating the temporal detector response into simulations, showing that a loss of resolution is apparent in both the images and their Fourier transforms. We conclude that the solid-state detector outperforms the photomultiplier-tube (PMT) based detectors in all areas bar a slightly less elliptical central hole and is likely the best detector to use for the majority of applications. However, using tools introduced here we encourage users to effectively evaluate what detector is most suitable for their experimental needs.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源