论文标题
部分可观测时空混沌系统的无模型预测
Multi-Objective Linear Ensembles for Robust and Sparse Training of Few-Bit Neural Networks
论文作者
论文摘要
储层计算是预测湍流的有力工具,其简单的架构具有处理大型系统的计算效率。然而,其实现通常需要完整的状态向量测量和系统非线性知识。我们使用非线性投影函数将系统测量扩展到高维空间,然后将其输入到储层中以获得预测。我们展示了这种储层计算网络在时空混沌系统上的应用,该系统模拟了湍流的若干特征。我们表明,使用径向基函数作为非线性投影器,即使只有部分观测并且不知道控制方程,也能稳健地捕捉复杂的系统非线性。最后,我们表明,当测量稀疏、不完整且带有噪声,甚至控制方程变得不准确时,我们的网络仍然可以产生相当准确的预测,从而为实际湍流系统的无模型预测铺平了道路。
Training neural networks (NNs) using combinatorial optimization solvers has gained attention in recent years. In low-data settings, state-of-the-art mixed integer linear programming solvers can train exactly a NN, avoiding intensive GPU-based training and hyper-parameter tuning and simultaneously training and sparsifying the network. We study the case of few-bit discrete-valued neural networks, both Binarized Neural Networks (BNNs), whose values are restricted to +-1, and Integer Neural Networks (INNs), whose values lie in a range {-P, ..., P}. Few-bit NNs receive increasing recognition due to their lightweight architecture and ability to run on low-power devices. This paper proposes new methods to improve the training of BNNs and INNs. Our contribution is a multi-objective ensemble approach based on training a single NN for each possible pair of classes and applying a majority voting scheme to predict the final output. Our approach results in training robust sparsified networks whose output is not affected by small perturbations on the input and whose number of active weights is as small as possible. We compare this BeMi approach to the current state-of-the-art in solver-based NN training and gradient-based training, focusing on BNN learning in few-shot contexts. We compare the benefits and drawbacks of INNs versus BNNs, bringing new light to the distribution of weights over the {-P, ..., P} interval. Finally, we compare multi-objective versus single-objective training of INNs, showing that robustness and network simplicity can be acquired simultaneously, thus obtaining better test performances. While the previous state-of-the-art approaches achieve an average accuracy of 51.1% on the MNIST dataset, the BeMi ensemble approach achieves an average accuracy of 68.4% when trained with 10 images per class and 81.8% when trained with 40 images per class, having up to 75.3% NN links removed.