论文标题

在盒子里思考,还是想思考?通过见解和概念的回报进行科学发现

To think inside the box, or to think out of the box? Scientific discovery via the reciprocation of insights and concepts

论文作者

Shi, Yu-Zhe, Xu, Manjie, Han, Wenjuan, Zhu, Yixin

论文摘要

如果科学发现是人类进步的主要驱动力之一,那么洞察力就是发动机的燃料,长期以来,它吸引了行为水平的研究以理解和建模其基本的认知过程。但是,当前的抽象科学发现的任务主要集中在洞察力的出现上,而忽略了领域知识所起的特殊作用。在此概念论文中,我们将科学发现视为\ of \ of \ of \ box $之间的一个相互作用,该\ box $积极寻求有见地的解决方案和$ thinky \ inside \ inside \ box $,它在概念领域知识上概括以保持正确。因此,我们提出了Mindle,这是一种语义搜索游戏,可以自发地触发科学发现的思维,作为大规模探索科学发现的基础设施。在此基础上,可以相互调查以进行见解和概念的用法。在试点研究中,一些有趣的观察激发了关于元主义,背景和个人多样性的详细假设,以进一步研究。

If scientific discovery is one of the main driving forces of human progress, insight is the fuel for the engine, which has long attracted behavior-level research to understand and model its underlying cognitive process. However, current tasks that abstract scientific discovery mostly focus on the emergence of insight, ignoring the special role played by domain knowledge. In this concept paper, we view scientific discovery as an interplay between $thinking \ out \ of \ the \ box$ that actively seeks insightful solutions and $thinking \ inside \ the \ box$ that generalizes on conceptual domain knowledge to keep correct. Accordingly, we propose Mindle, a semantic searching game that triggers scientific-discovery-like thinking spontaneously, as infrastructure for exploring scientific discovery on a large scale. On this basis, the meta-strategies for insights and the usage of concepts can be investigated reciprocally. In the pilot studies, several interesting observations inspire elaborated hypotheses on meta-strategies, context, and individual diversity for further investigations.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源