论文标题

鉴于最近的宇宙微波背景各向异性实验,标准宇宙学模型的健康检查测试

Health checkup test of the standard cosmological model in view of recent Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropies experiments

论文作者

Di Valentino, Eleonora, Giarè, William, Melchiorri, Alessandro, Silk, Joseph

论文摘要

我们介绍了对宇宙微波背景温度各向异性和极化角度谱的最新观察结果的最新数据分析比较,该观察是由四个不同的实验发布的:一侧的普朗克卫星,以及Atacama Cosmology望远镜(ACTPOL)和South Pole Bee(Spt-3G)的订单(wmap of stall satell)另一边的“独立于普朗克”。我们以系统的方式进行了8个扩展宇宙学模型,该模型与基线$λ$ CDM案例不同,包括许多不同的自由度组合,目的是找到一个可行的最小扩展模型,可以将所有CMB实验带入一致。我们的分析为CMB角功率谱中的异常提供了一些提示,即使在这些多参数空间中也持续存在的标准宇宙学模型。这表明CMB数据中有重要的未算数系统是产生偏见的结果,或者$λ$ CDM是对自然的不正确/不完整的描述。我们得出的结论是,只有未来独立的高精度CMB温度和极化测量才能提供明确的答案。

We present an updated data-analysis comparison of the most recent observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background temperature anisotropies and polarization angular power spectra released by four different experiments: the Planck satellite on one side, and the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACTPol) and the South Pole Telescope (SPT-3G), combined with the WMAP satellite 9-years observation data in order to be "Planck-independent" on the other side. We investigate in a systematic way 8 extended cosmological models that differ from the baseline $Λ$CDM case by the inclusion of many different combinations of additional degrees of freedom, with the aim of finding a viable minimal extended model that can bring all the CMB experiments in agreement. Our analysis provides several hints for anomalies in the CMB angular power spectra in tension with the standard cosmological model that persist even in these multi-parameter spaces. This indicates that either significant unaccounted-for systematics in the CMB data are producing biased results or that $Λ$CDM is an incorrect/incomplete description of Nature. We conclude that only future independent high-precision CMB temperature and polarization measurements could provide a definitive answer.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源