论文标题
界面处的静电互补驱动瞬时蛋白质 - 蛋白质相互作用
Electrostatic complementarity at the interface drives transient protein-protein interactions
论文作者
论文摘要
了解驱动生物分子之间结合的分子机制在分子生物学中是一个至关重要的挑战。在这方面,像结合界面的优先疏水组成一样,范德华相互作用(短距离力)的作用以及相互作用的分子表面之间的形状互补性等特征。但是,尚未就蛋白质 - 蛋白质相互作用的各个阶段参与的静电方式和多少参与尚无共识。在这里,我们对蛋白质复合物的大数据集进行了广泛的分析,可为其提供实验性结合亲和力和pH数据。我们发现(i)尽管不同类别的二聚体在氨基酸组成中没有明显的差异,并且在结合区域中充电的处置性,但(ii)具有相同结合区域的同型二聚体显示出较高的静电兼容性,与具有非相同结合区域和异源二聚体的同型二聚体相对于同型二聚体。静电兼容性水平也随络合物的pH值而变化,达到低pH值的最低值。有趣的是,(iii)形状和静电互补性在一个复合物通过结合亲和力使复合物分层时的表现相对。相反,具有较低结合亲和力的复合物利用了库仑互补以获得特异性,这表明静电互补性可能在瞬态(或稳定)复合物中起更大的作用。鉴于这些结果,(iv)我们提供了一种快速有效的方法来测量静电互补,而无需知道复杂的结构。根据2D正交多项式扩展静电势,我们可以区分瞬态和永久性蛋白质复合物,而ROC为0.8。
Understanding the molecular mechanisms driving the binding between bio-molecules is a crucial challenge in molecular biology. In this respect, characteristics like the preferentially hydrophobic composition of the binding interfaces, the role of van der Waals interactions (short range forces), and the consequent shape complementarity between the interacting molecular surfaces are well established. However, no consensus has yet been reached on how and how much electrostatic participates in the various stages of protein-protein interactions. Here, we perform extensive analyses on a large dataset of protein complexes for which both experimental binding affinity and pH data were available. We found that (i) although different classes of dimers do not present marked differences in the amino acid composition and charges disposition in the binding region, (ii) homodimers with identical binding region show higher electrostatic compatibility with respect to both homodimers with non-identical binding region and heterodimers. The level of electrostatic compatibility also varies with the pH of the complex, reaching the lowest values for low pH. Interestingly, (iii) shape and electrostatic complementarity behave oppositely when one stratifies the complexes by their binding affinity. Conversely, complexes with low values of binding affinity exploit Coulombic complementarity to acquire specificity, suggesting that electrostatic complementarity may play a greater role in transient (or less stable) complexes. In light of these results, (iv) we provide a fast and efficient method to measure electrostatic complementarity without the need of knowing the complex structure. Expanding the electrostatic potential on a basis of 2D orthogonal polynomials, we can discriminate between transient and permanent protein complexes with an AUC of the ROC of 0.8.