论文标题

重新访问Chaplygin气体宇宙学,最近观察到高红色类星体

Revisiting Chaplygin gas cosmologies with the recent observations of high-redshfit quasars

论文作者

Zheng, Jie, Cao, Shuo, Lian, Yujie, Liu, Tonghua, Liu, Yuting, Zhu, Zong-Hong

论文摘要

在本文中,我们使用涵盖$ 0.04 <z <5.1 $的红移范围的类星体的最新观察结果,以研究一系列Chaplygin气模型作为统一的暗物质和暗能量的候选者。基于可用标准蜡烛和标准尺度数据的不同组合,我们对广义的Chaplygin气体(GCG),改良的Chaplygin气体(MCG),新的广义Chaplygin气体(NGCG)和粘性广义Chaplygin Gas(VGCG)模型提出了约束。此外,我们基于Markov Chain Monte Carlo方法得出的统计结果,应用Jensen-Shannon Divergence(JSD),State-Finder Diagnostics和偏差信息标准(DIC)来区分这些CG模型。结果表明,(1)标准标准数据可以对本分析中考虑的不同CG模型的宇宙学参数提供更严格的约束。有趣的是,物质密度参数$ω_{m} $和Hubble常数$ H_ {0} $从可用数据中得出的$与Planck 2018结果中的数据非常一致; (2)根据JSD的统计标准,我们的发现证明了Chaplygin气体与一致性$λ$ CDM模型之间的良好稠度。但是,在StateFinder Diagnostics的框架中,GCG和NGCG模型不能与$λ$ CDM区分开,而MCG和VGCG模型在当前时期中与$λ$ CDM显示出显着偏差。 (3)根据DIC的统计标准,我们表明MCG和VGCG模型具有高还原类种子的大量观察性支持,而GCG和NGCG模型错过了较少的观察力支持类别,但不能排除。

In this paper, we use the latest observations of quasars covering the redshift range of $0.04<z<5.1$ to investigate a series of Chaplygin gas models as candidates for unified dark matter and dark energy. Based on different combinations of available standard candle and standard ruler data, we put constraints on the generalized Chaplygin gas (GCG), modified Chaplygin gas (MCG), new generalized Chaplygin gas (NGCG) and viscous generalized Chaplygin gas (VGCG) models. Moreover, we apply Jensen-Shannon divergence (JSD), statefinder diagnostics, and the deviance information criterion (DIC) to distinguish these CG models, based on the statistical results derived from Markov chain Monte Carlo method. The results show that (1) The standard ruler data could provide more stringent constraints on the cosmological parameters of different CG models considered in this analysis. Interestingly, the matter density parameter $Ω_{m}$ and Hubble constant $H_{0}$ derived from the available data are well consistent with those from the Planck 2018 results; (2) Based on the statistical criteria JSD, our findings demonstrate the well consistency between Chaplygin gas and the concordance $Λ$CDM model. However, in the framework of statefinder diagnostics, the GCG and NGCG models cannot be distinguished from $Λ$CDM, while MCG and VGCG models show significant deviation from $Λ$CDM in the present epoch; (3) According to the the statistical criteria DIC, we show that the MCG and VGCG models have substantial observational support from high-redshfit quasars, whereas the GCG and NGCG models miss out on the less observational support category but can not be ruled out.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源