论文标题
不确定性关系是什么?
What is nonclassical about uncertainty relations?
论文作者
论文摘要
不确定性关系在单个状态上具有共同预测的不同测量结果的程度表示限制。量子理论中非平凡的不确定性关系的存在通常被认为是它偏离古典世界观的一种方式。但是,这种观点受到了以下事实的破坏,即存在表现出非平凡的不确定性关系,但与经典的世界观相一致,只要他们承认广义非官方本体论模型。这提示了一个问题,即不确定性关系的哪些方面(如果有的话)不能以这种方式实现,因此构成了真正的非经典性的证据。我们在这里考虑了不确定性关系,描述了一对二元 - 结果测量值的可预测性(例如,在量子理论中对Pauli X和Pauli Z可观察物的测量值)。我们表明,对于满足特定对称属性的一类理论,这种可预测性权衡的功能形式受非上下文性的限制,以低于线性曲线。由于量子量子理论具有相关的对称属性,因此其可预测性权衡描述了一个圆的一部分,这是违反这种非上下文结合的事实,因此构成了一个示例,说明了不确定性关系的功能形式如何见证上下文。我们还推断出对选定的一组操作箔对量子理论的影响,并考虑对三个测量值的概括。
Uncertainty relations express limits on the extent to which the outcomes of distinct measurements on a single state can be made jointly predictable. The existence of nontrivial uncertainty relations in quantum theory is generally considered to be a way in which it entails a departure from the classical worldview. However, this perspective is undermined by the fact that there exist operational theories which exhibit nontrivial uncertainty relations but which are consistent with the classical worldview insofar as they admit of a generalized-noncontextual ontological model. This prompts the question of what aspects of uncertainty relations, if any, cannot be realized in this way and so constitute evidence of genuine nonclassicality. We here consider uncertainty relations describing the tradeoff between the predictability of a pair of binary-outcome measurements (e.g., measurements of Pauli X and Pauli Z observables in quantum theory). We show that, for a class of theories satisfying a particular symmetry property, the functional form of this predictability tradeoff is constrained by noncontextuality to be below a linear curve. Because qubit quantum theory has the relevant symmetry property, the fact that its predictability tradeoff describes a section of a circle is a violation of this noncontextual bound, and therefore constitutes an example of how the functional form of an uncertainty relation can witness contextuality. We also deduce the implications for a selected group of operational foils to quantum theory and consider the generalization to three measurements.