学术文献库

The use of crowdsourced data has been finding practical use for enhancing situational awareness during disasters. While recent studies have shown promising results regarding the potential of crowdsourced data for flood mapping, little attention has been paid to data imbalances issues that could introduce biases. We examine biases present in crowdsourced reports to identify data imbalances with a goal of improving disaster situational awareness. Sample bias, spatial bias, and demographic bias are examined as we analyzed reported flooding from 3-1-1, Waze reports, and FEMA damage data collected in the aftermaths of Tropical Storm Imelda in 2019 and Hurricane Ida in 2021. Integrating other flooding related topics from 3-1-1 reports into the Global Moran's I and Local Indicator of Spatial Association (LISA) test revealed more communities that were impacted by floods. To examine spatial bias, we perform the LISA and BI-LISA tests on the three datasets at the census tract and census block group level. By looking at two geographical aggregations, we found that the larger spatial aggregations, census tracts, show less data imbalance in the results. Finally, one-way analysis of Variance (ANOVA) test performed on the clusters generated from the BI-LISA shows that data imbalance exists in areas where minority populations reside. Through a regression analysis, we found that 3-1-1 and Waze reports have data imbalance limitations in areas where minority populations reside. The findings of this study advance understanding of data imbalances and biases in crowdsourced datasets that are growingly used for disaster situational awareness.