论文标题

动态亚群集感知网络,用于几次皮肤疾病分类

Dynamic Sub-Cluster-Aware Network for Few-Shot Skin Disease Classification

论文作者

LI, Shuhan, Li, Xiaomeng, Xu, Xiaowei, Cheng, Kwang-Ting

论文摘要

本文通过引入一种名为亚群集感知网络(SCAN)的新方法来解决几乎没有发作的皮肤疾病分类的问题,该方法提高了诊断稀有皮肤疾病的准确性。促使扫描设计的主要见解是,观察到一类中的皮肤病图像通常表现出多个子群体,其特征是外观的不同变化。为了提高几次学习的表现,我们专注于学习一个高质量的特征编码器,该编码器捕获了每个疾病类中独特的亚簇表示,从而可以更好地表征特征分布。具体而言,扫描遵循双分支框架,第一个分支在其中学习班级特征以区分不同的皮肤疾病,第二个分支旨在学习可以有效地将每个类别分为几个组的特征,以保留每个类中的亚簇结构。为了实现第二个分支的目标,我们提出了群集损失,以通过无监督的聚类来学习图像相似性。为了确保每个子集群中的样品来自同一类,我们进一步设计了纯度损失,以完善无监督的聚类结果。我们在两个公共数据集上评估了拟议方法,以进行几次皮肤疾病分类。实验结果证明,就SD-198和DERM7PT数据集​​的灵敏度,特异性,准确性和F1分数而言,我们的框架的表现优于最先进的方法约为2%至5%。

This paper addresses the problem of few-shot skin disease classification by introducing a novel approach called the Sub-Cluster-Aware Network (SCAN) that enhances accuracy in diagnosing rare skin diseases. The key insight motivating the design of SCAN is the observation that skin disease images within a class often exhibit multiple sub-clusters, characterized by distinct variations in appearance. To improve the performance of few-shot learning, we focus on learning a high-quality feature encoder that captures the unique sub-clustered representations within each disease class, enabling better characterization of feature distributions. Specifically, SCAN follows a dual-branch framework, where the first branch learns class-wise features to distinguish different skin diseases, and the second branch aims to learn features which can effectively partition each class into several groups so as to preserve the sub-clustered structure within each class. To achieve the objective of the second branch, we present a cluster loss to learn image similarities via unsupervised clustering. To ensure that the samples in each sub-cluster are from the same class, we further design a purity loss to refine the unsupervised clustering results. We evaluate the proposed approach on two public datasets for few-shot skin disease classification. The experimental results validate that our framework outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by around 2% to 5% in terms of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and F1-score on the SD-198 and Derm7pt datasets.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源