论文标题
BAL类星体周围横向接近效应的探索性研究
Exploratory Study of Transverse Proximity Effect around BAL Quasars
论文作者
论文摘要
我们旨在找出为什么在类星体周围存在各向异性HI吸收的原因;也就是说,类星体周围的环境高度偏向于在横向方向上产生强大的HI吸收,而沿着视线的几种类星体在数量的数量中存在很大的HI吸收障碍。对这种相反趋势的最合理的解释是,由于灰尘圆环而导致的类星体紫外线辐射遮盖了横向。但是,这个想法的一个关键弱点是,我们没有关于视线相对于圆环的倾斜角度的信息。在这项研究中,我们检查了在其光谱中具有广泛吸收槽的类星体环境(即Bal Quasars),因为人们普遍认为,如果通过在灰尘圆环附近从侧面看到中央连续体,则可以观察到Bal槽。与$θ$$ <$ 120 $^{\ prime \ prime} $的分离角度紧密分离的12个类星体对,我们检查了背景类星体光谱中的前景BAL Quasars的HI吸收。我们确认在12个BAL类星体中的两个左右存在光学厚的气体,并且平均HI吸收强度为ew $ _ {\ rm rest} $$ \ sim $ 1A。尽管在统计学上不显着,但这些与过去的结果是一致的。但是,由于其圆柱密度不同$ \ sim $ 3 $ 3的数量级,因此BAL和非BAL类星品周围光学厚的HI吸收器的起源可能有所不同。为了缩小类星体周围的各向异性HI吸收的可能方案,需要较大的样本。
We aim to find out the reason why there exists an anisotropic HI absorption around quasars; i.e., the environments around quasars are highly biased toward producing strong HI absorption in transverse direction while there exists a significant deficit of HI absorption within a few Mpc of quasars along line-of-sight. The most plausible explanation for this opposite trend is that the transverse direction is shadowed from the quasar UV radiation due to dust torus. However, a critical weakness of this idea is that we have no information on inclination angle of our sightline relative to the torus. In this study, we examine environments of quasars with broad absorption troughs in their spectra (i.e., BAL quasars) because it is widely believed that BAL troughs are observed if the central continuum is viewed from the side through their powerful outflows near the dust torus. With closely separated 12 projected quasar pairs at different redshift with separation angle of $θ$$<$120$^{\prime\prime}$, we examine HI absorption at foreground BAL quasars in spectra of background quasars. We confirm there exist optically thick gas around two of 12 BAL quasars, and that the mean HI absorption strength is EW$_{\rm rest}$$\sim$1A. These are consistent to the past results around non-BAL quasars, although not statistically significant. However, the origins of optically thick HI absorbers around BAL and non-BAL quasars could be different since their column densities are different by $\sim$3 orders of magnitude. The larger sample would be required for narrowing down possible scenarios for the anisotropic HI absorption around quasars.