论文标题

双交叉偏振的GPR测量方法用于检测和取向估算浅埋的细长物体

Dual-Cross-Polarized GPR Measurement Method for Detection and Orientation Estimation of Shallowly Buried Elongated Object

论文作者

Sun, Hai-Han, Lee, Yee Hui, Luo, Wenhao, Ow, Lai Fern, Yusof, Mohamed Lokman Mohd, Yucel, Abdulkadir C.

论文摘要

由于存在强大的地面混乱,可以掩盖目标反射,从而检测出浅掩埋和细长的物体并使用普遍采用的共偏GPR系统估算其方向。交叉偏振配置可用于抑制地面混乱并揭示对象反射,但它具有不一致的检测能力,随着对象方向的不同,它会有很大变化。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种双偏置检测(DCPD)方法,该方法利用两个具有特殊布置的交叉偏振天线来检测物体。物体反射并由两个天线收集的信号以旋转不变的方式组合在一起,以确保有效的地面混乱抑制和一致的检测,而与对象方向无关。此外,我们提出了一种双重偏振方向估计(DCPOE)算法,以从两个交叉极化数据中估算对象方向。所提出的DCPOE算法受环境噪声的影响较小,并且执行稳健而准确的方位角估计。使用实验数据证明了所提出的技术在检测和取向估计中的有效性及其在现有方法中的优势。比较结果表明,Alford旋转算法的最大和平均误差为22.3°和10.9°,而所建议的DCPOE算法在已证明的浅埋入对象病例中的拟议DCPOE算法的最大误差为4.9°和1.8°。拟议的技术可以在框架中统一,以促进对浅埋入和伸长目标的调查和映射。

Detecting a shallowly buried and elongated object and estimating its orientation using a commonly adopted co-polarized GPR system is challenging due to the presence of strong ground clutter that masks the target reflection. A cross-polarized configuration can be used to suppress ground clutter and reveal the object reflection, but it suffers from inconsistent detection capability which significantly varies with different object orientations. To address this issue, we propose a dual-cross-polarized detection (DCPD) method which utilizes two cross-polarized antennas with a special arrangement to detect the object. The signals reflected by the object and collected by the two antennas are combined in a rotationally invariant manner to ensure both effective ground clutter suppression and consistent detection irrespective of the object orientation. In addition, we present a dual-cross-polarized orientation estimation (DCPOE) algorithm to estimate the object orientation from the two cross-polarized data. The proposed DCPOE algorithm is less affected by environmental noise and performs robust and accurate azimuth angle estimation. The effectiveness of the proposed techniques in the detection and orientation estimation and their advantages over the existing method have been demonstrated using experimental data. Comparison results show that the maximum and average errors are 22.3° and 10.9° for the Alford rotation algorithm, while those are 4.9° and 1.8° for the proposed DCPOE algorithm in the demonstrated shallowly buried object cases. The proposed techniques can be unified in a framework to facilitate the investigation and mapping of shallowly buried and elongated targets.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源