论文标题
质量与速度的能源需求预测区域供暖系统
Quality versus speed in energy demand prediction for district heating systems
论文作者
论文摘要
在本文中,我们考虑了地区供暖系统中的能源需求预测。在竞争性电力市场中提供电能时,有效的能源需求预测对于加热动力系统至关重要。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了两组算法:(1)E。dotzauer提出的算法的新型扩展,以及(2)基于一周一小时的调整后的线性回归基于移动能量消耗的平均线性回归。将这两种方法与最新的人工神经网络进行了比较。能源需求预测算法具有各种计算成本和预测质量。虽然预测质量是一种广泛使用的预测指标优势衡量标准,但计算成本的分析频率较低,并且其影响并未得到广泛研究。当使用新数据不断更新预测算法时,某些计算昂贵的预测方法可能会变得不可应用。计算成本可以分为培训和执行零件。执行部分是应用已经训练的算法预测某些东西时支付的成本。在本文中,我们在培训和执行中评估了上述方法对质量和计算成本的评估。该比较是在波兰西北部的一个地区供暖系统的现实世界数据集上进行的。
In this paper, we consider energy demand prediction in district heating systems. Effective energy demand prediction is essential in combined heat power systems when offering electrical energy in competitive electricity markets. To address this problem, we propose two sets of algorithms: (1) a novel extension to the algorithm proposed by E. Dotzauer and (2) an autoregressive predictor based on hour-of-week adjusted linear regression on moving averages of energy consumption. These two methods are compared against state-of-the-art artificial neural networks. Energy demand predictor algorithms have various computational costs and prediction quality. While prediction quality is a widely used measure of predictor superiority, computational costs are less frequently analyzed and their impact is not so extensively studied. When predictor algorithms are constantly updated using new data, some computationally expensive forecasting methods may become inapplicable. The computational costs can be split into training and execution parts. The execution part is the cost paid when the already trained algorithm is applied to predict something. In this paper, we evaluate the above methods with respect to the quality and computational costs, both in the training and in the execution. The comparison is conducted on a real-world dataset from a district heating system in the northwest part of Poland.