论文标题
估计儿童税收抵免的受益人:过去,现在和未来
Estimating beneficiaries of the child tax credit: past, present, and future
论文作者
论文摘要
政府致力于解决儿童贫困的努力,通常涵盖加强家庭收入的经济援助计划。儿童税收抵免(CTC)是最突出的例子。该计划由美国国会于1997年提出,旨在通过收入稳定来帮助工作父母。我们的工作检查了CTC这样做的程度。我们的研究记录了福利实现中性别不平等的清晰,一致且令人信服的证据,得出了四个关键发现。首先,严格的必要收入阈值不成比例地劣势单身母亲,反映了该人口的高浓度在收入分配的较低部分中。其次,已婚父母,在较小程度上,单一父亲是CTC计划的主要受益人,当时福利是作为信用而不是退款的。第三,使计划受益更大的慷慨降低了与已婚父母和单身父亲相对于已婚父母和单身父亲的单身母亲可以声称这一收益。第四,最后,提高的信用可扣除性可以减轻救济资格中的性别差异,尽管这样做会自行施加外部性。我们的发现可以为围绕CTC等计划的效力以及旨在减轻儿童贫困的计划的有效性提供介绍的公共政策论述。
Government efforts to address child poverty commonly encompass economic assistance programs that bolster household income. The Child Tax Credit (CTC) is the most prominent example of this. Introduced by the United States Congress in 1997, the program endeavors to help working parents via income stabilization. Our work examines the extent to which the CTC has done so. Our study, which documents clear, consistent, and compelling evidence of gender inequity in benefits realization, yields four key findings. First, stringent requisite income thresholds disproportionally disadvantage single mothers, a reflection of the high concentration of this demographic in lower segments of the income distribution. Second, married parents and, to a lesser extent, single fathers, are the primary beneficiaries of the CTC program when benefits are structured as credits rather than refunds. Third, making program benefits more generous disproportionally reduces how many single mothers, relative to married parents and single fathers, can claim this benefit. Fourth and finally, increasing credit refundability can mitigate gender differences in relief eligibility, although doing so imposes externalities of its own. Our findings can inform public policy discourse surrounding the efficacy of programs like the CTC and the effectiveness of programs aimed at alleviating child poverty.