论文标题
太空环保主义的案例
The Case for Space Environmentalism
论文作者
论文摘要
由Karman线与地球表面80至100公里的高度结合的外壳,而地球同步轨道(36,000公里)被定义为地球周围的轨道空间。正是在该地区,尤其是在低地轨道(LEO)内,由于人为空间对象种群的快速增长,包括卫星“巨型构成”,环境问题变得越来越紧迫。从这个角度来看,我们总结了地球周围的轨道空间应被视为额外的生态系统,因此要受到相同的护理和关注以及与海洋和大气相同的广泛规定。我们通过查看轨道空间环境以及在其内部工作来依靠它。因此,我们应该考虑损害专业天文学,公共观星和天空的文化重要性,以及太空中商业,公民和军事活动的可持续性。对轨道空间环境的损害具有与其他类型的环境问题共同的问题。首先,观察到的和预测的损害是增量且复杂的,有许多贡献者。其次,是否在正式和法律上被视为全球共享,对可能看起来“免费”资源的商业开发越来越多,实际上是外在化真实成本。
The shell bound by the Karman line at a height of 80 to 100km above the Earth's surface, and Geosynchronous Orbit, at 36,000km, is defined as the orbital space surrounding the Earth. It is within this region, and especially in Low Earth Orbit (LEO), where environmental issues are becoming urgent because of the rapid growth of the anthropogenic space object population, including satellite "mega-constellations". In this Perspective, we summarise the case that the orbital space around the Earth should be considered an additional ecosystem, and so subject to the same care and concerns and the same broad regulations as, for example, the oceans and the atmosphere. We rely on the orbital space environment by looking through it as well as by working within it. Hence, we should consider damage to professional astronomy, public stargazing and the cultural importance of the sky, as well as the sustainability of commercial, civic and military activity in space. Damage to the orbital space environment has problematic features in common with other types of environmental issue. First, the observed and predicted damage is incremental and complex, with many contributors. Second, whether or not space is formally and legally seen as a global commons, the growing commercial exploitation of what may appear a "free" resource is in fact externalising the true costs.