论文标题

中国学术期刊的微信吸收:对CSSCI索引期刊的分析

WeChat uptake of Chinese scholarly journals: an analysis of CSSCI-indexed journals

论文作者

Cong, Ting, Fang, Zhichao, Costas, Rodrigo

论文摘要

近年来,关于如何讨论科学的研究以及学术参与者如何在社交媒体上互动在科学计量学领域变得越来越流行。尽管大多数先前的研究都专注于在全球平台上讨论的研究输出(例如Twitter或Facebook),但很少研究本地平台上的学术期刊,尤其是在中国社交媒体背景下。为了填补这一空白,本研究调查了中国社会科学引文指数(CSSCI)索引的中国学术期刊对微信(中国社交网络应用程序)的吸收。结果表明,65.3%的CSSCI索引期刊创建了微信公共帐户,并总共发布了超过1.9.3万微信帖子。在期刊级别上,文献计量指标(例如引用,下载和期刊影响因素)和微信指标(例如,点击,喜欢,喜欢,答复和建议)彼此之间存在微弱相关性,从而增强了图书馆和社交媒体媒体学分之间从根本上分化的指标维度的概念。结果还表明,带有微信的公共帐户的期刊在引用影响方面略优胜那些没有微信的公共帐户的期刊,这表明科学期刊的微信大多与引文影响相关。

The study of how science is discussed and how scholarly actors interact on social media has increasingly become popular in the field of scientometrics in recent years. While most prior studies focused on research outputs discussed on global platforms, such as Twitter or Facebook, the presence of scholarly journals on local platforms was seldom studied, especially in the Chinese social media context. To fill this gap, this study investigates the uptake of WeChat (a Chinese social network app) by the Chinese scholarly journals indexed by the Chinese Social Sciences Citation Index (CSSCI). The results show that 65.3% of CSSCI-indexed journals have created WeChat public accounts and posted over 193 thousand WeChat posts in total. At the journal level, bibliometric indicators (e.g., citations, downloads, and journal impact factors) and WeChat indicators (e.g., clicks, likes, replies, and recommendations) are weakly correlated with each other, reinforcing the idea of fundamentally differentiated dimensions of indicators between bibliometrics and social media metrics. Results also show that journals with WeChat public accounts slightly outperform those without WeChat public accounts in terms of citation impact, suggesting that the WeChat presence of scientific journals is mostly positively associated with their citation impact.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源