论文标题

X射线观察是否可以改善基于类星体的基于光学的积分率估计值?

Can X-ray Observations Improve Optical-UV-based Accretion-Rate Estimates for Quasars?

论文作者

Marlar, Andrea, Shemmer, Ohad, Brotherton, Michael S., Richards, Gordon T., Dix, Cooper

论文摘要

当前对类星体(L/L_EDD)归一化积聚速率的估计值依赖于测量宽光学-UV发射线的速度宽度(例如H $β$和MG II $ \ lambda2800 $)。但是,在最遥远的类星体中,这种线条往往很弱或无法访问,从而导致$ z> 6 $的L/L_EDD估计值增加。利用具有H $β$和C IV $ \ lambda1549 $光谱的53种无线电定价样品以及{\ sl Chandra}的覆盖范围,我们搜索了可靠的积分率指示器,用于Quasars,尤其是在最高的Redshifts($ z $ z $ Z 6-7 $ 6-7 $ 6-7 $)上。我们的分析探索了基于H $β$β$的L/L_EDD,C IV的等效宽度(EW)与光学到X射线光谱斜率(A_OX)之间的关系。我们的结果表明,EW(C IV)是基于H $β$β$的L/L_EDD参数的最强指标,这与先前的研究一致,尽管显着的散布持续存在,特别是对于较弱的C IV线的来源。我们找不到改善此关系的A_OX参数的证据,也没有发现A_OX与基于H $β$的L/L_EDD之间的显着相关性。缺乏改善的关系可能会揭示我们样本中的局限性。在$ z \ gtrsim 1 $上发现的其他发光源的X射线观察可能使我们可以减轻档案样本中固有的偏见,并测试X射线数据是否可以改善L/L_EDD估计值。此外,对我们来源的更深入的X射线观察可以提供对硬X射线幂律光子指数($γ$)的准确测量,该指数被认为是无偏见的L/L_EDD指示器。 EW(C IV)与A_OX与基于$γ$的L/L_EDD之间的相关性可能会产生更强大的类星体归一化积分率的预测。

Current estimates of the normalized accretion rates of quasars (L/L_Edd), rely on measuring the velocity widths of broad optical-UV emission lines (e.g., H$β$ and Mg II $\lambda2800$). However, such lines tend to be weak or inaccessible in the most distant quasars, leading to increasing uncertainty in L/L_Edd estimates at $z > 6$. Utilizing a carefully selected sample of 53 radio-quiet quasars that have H$β$ and C IV $\lambda1549$ spectroscopy as well as {\sl Chandra} coverage, we searched for a robust accretion-rate indicator for quasars, particularly at the highest-accessible redshifts ($z \sim 6-7$). Our analysis explored relationships between the H$β$-based L/L_Edd, the equivalent width (EW) of C IV, and the optical-to-X-ray spectral slope (a_ox). Our results show that EW(C IV) is the strongest indicator of the H$β$-based L/L_Edd parameter, consistent with previous studies, although significant scatter persists particularly for sources with weak C IV lines. We do not find evidence for the a_ox parameter improving this relation, and we do not find a significant correlation between a_ox and H$β$-based L/L_Edd. This absence of an improved relationship may reveal a limitation in our sample. X-ray observations of additional luminous sources, found at $z \gtrsim 1$, may allow us to mitigate the biases inherent in our archival sample and test whether X-ray data could improve L/L_Edd estimates. Furthermore, deeper X-ray observations of our sources may provide accurate measurements of the hard-X-ray power-law photon index ($Γ$), which is considered an unbiased L/L_Edd indicator. Correlations between EW(C IV) and a_ox with $Γ$-based L/L_Edd may yield a more robust prediction of a quasar normalized accretion rate.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源