论文标题
因果推断与经常性和竞争事件
Causal inference with recurrent and competing events
论文作者
论文摘要
许多研究问题涉及治疗对结果的影响,这些影响可能会在同一个人中复发多次。例如,医学研究人员对对心力衰竭患者住院治疗的影响感兴趣,运动员的运动损伤感兴趣。诸如死亡之类的竞争事件使因果关系复杂化,因为一旦发生竞争事件,一个人就无法进行更复发事件。在经常发生的事件设置中,有或没有竞争事件,已经研究了几项统计估计。但是,这些估计值的因果解释以及从观察到的数据中识别这些估计数所需的条件尚未正式化。在这里,我们使用一个正式的因果推论来制定复发事件设置中的几个因果估计,并没有竞争事件。我们澄清何时可以将常用的经典统计估计值解释为因果中介文献中的因果量,例如(控制的)直接效应和总效应。此外,我们表明,有关干预主义调解估计的最新结果使我们能够定义新的因果估计,并具有反复和竞争性事件的新因果估计,这在许多主题环境中可能特别临床相关。我们使用因果定向的无环图和单个世界干预图来说明如何根据主题知识为各种因果估计的识别条件推理。此外,使用对计数过程的结果,我们表明我们的因果估计及其识别条件(在离散时间内阐明)将其收敛于经典的连续时间对应物,限制了时间的良好离散时间。
Many research questions concern treatment effects on outcomes that can recur several times in the same individual. For example, medical researchers are interested in treatment effects on hospitalizations in heart failure patients and sports injuries in athletes. Competing events, such as death, complicate causal inference in studies of recurrent events because once a competing event occurs, an individual cannot have more recurrent events. Several statistical estimands have been studied in recurrent event settings, with and without competing events. However, the causal interpretations of these estimands, and the conditions that are required to identify these estimands from observed data, have yet to be formalized. Here we use a formal framework for causal inference to formulate several causal estimands in recurrent event settings, with and without competing events. We clarify when commonly used classical statistical estimands can be interpreted as causal quantities from the causal mediation literature, such as (controlled) direct effects and total effects. Furthermore, we show that recent results on interventionist mediation estimands allow us to define new causal estimands with recurrent and competing events that may be of particular clinical relevance in many subject matter settings. We use causal directed acyclic graphs and single world intervention graphs to illustrate how to reason about identification conditions for the various causal estimands based on subject matter knowledge. Furthermore, using results on counting processes, we show that our causal estimands and their identification conditions, which are articulated in discrete time, converge to classical continuous time counterparts in the limit of fine discretizations of time.