论文标题
回复“在物理空间的季节模型中对贝尔定理与本地现实主义的评论”
Reply to "Comment on 'Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space'"
论文作者
论文摘要
在本文中，我回应了对我以前在该期刊上发表的一篇论文之一的批评，题为“贝尔定理与本地现实主义在Quaternionic的物理空间模型中”。该论文介绍了基于Quaternion 3-Sphere的量子相关性的地方现实模型，该模型被视为一个物理空间，我们被局限于执行所有实验。另一方面，批评考虑了平坦的欧几里得空间中的两个完全不同的模型，这与我的Quaternionic 3-Sphere模型既没有关系。然后，它批评了自己的平坦空间模型，并声称它批评了我的论文中介绍的模型。一路上，没有提供证据或证据，它声称我的论文中的结果是基于错误。我证明我的论文中没有任何错误。相反，我从批评及其所依赖的批评中提出了许多基本数学和概念上的错误。
In this paper, I respond to a critique of one of my papers previously published in this journal, entitled "Bell's Theorem Versus Local Realism in a Quaternionic Model of Physical Space." That paper presents a local-realistic model of quantum correlations based on a quaternionic 3-sphere, taken as a physical space in which we are confined to perform all our experiments. The critique, on the other hand, considers two entirely different models within a flat Euclidean space, neither related to my quaternionic 3-sphere model. It then criticizes its own flat space models and claims that it has thereby criticized the model presented in my paper. Along the way, without providing evidence or proof, it claims that the results in my paper are based on mistakes. I demonstrate that there are no mistakes of any kind in my paper. On the contrary, I bring out a number of elementary mathematical and conceptual mistakes from the critique and the critiques it relies on.
