论文标题
自动化的房颤分类基于固定堆叠的自动编码器并优化了深层网络
Automated Atrial Fibrillation Classification Based on Denoising Stacked Autoencoder and Optimized Deep Network
论文作者
论文摘要
房颤(AFIB)的发生率在全球范围内以艰巨的速度增加。为了早期检测AFIB的风险,我们开发了一种基于深神经网络的自动检测系统。为了实现更好的分类,必须对生理信号进行良好的预处理。牢记这一点,我们提出了一项两倍的研究。首先,提出了一种端到端模型,以使用Denoising Autocododer(DAE)来定位心电图信号。为了实现Denoising,我们使用了三个网络,包括卷积神经网络(CNN),密集神经网络(DNN)和经常性神经网络(RNN)。比较了三种模型和基于CNN的DAE性能比其他两个更好。因此,使用基于CNN的DAE授予的信号用于训练深层神经网络进行分类。已经使用准确性,特异性,灵敏度和噪声比(SNR)作为评估标准对三个神经网络的性能进行了评估。 在这项研究中,提出的用于检测房颤的端到端深度学习模型的准确率为99.20%,特异性为99.50%,灵敏度为99.50%,真正的正率为99.00%。我们比较的算法的平均准确性为96.26%,算法的准确性比其他算法平均值高3.2%。与其他两个相比,CNN分类网络的性能更好。此外,该模型在实时应用程序上是计算上有效的,并且处理24小时的ECG信号需要大约1.3秒。还在具有不同比例的心律不齐的不看到的数据集上测试了所提出的模型,以检查模型的鲁棒性,这导致了99.10%的召回率和98.50%的精度。
The incidences of atrial fibrillation (AFib) are increasing at a daunting rate worldwide. For the early detection of the risk of AFib, we have developed an automatic detection system based on deep neural networks. For achieving better classification, it is mandatory to have good pre-processing of physiological signals. Keeping this in mind, we have proposed a two-fold study. First, an end-to-end model is proposed to denoise the electrocardiogram signals using denoising autoencoders (DAE). To achieve denoising, we have used three networks including, convolutional neural network (CNN), dense neural network (DNN), and recurrent neural networks (RNN). Compared the three models and CNN based DAE performance is found to be better than the other two. Therefore, the signals denoised by the CNN based DAE were used to train the deep neural networks for classification. Three neural networks' performance has been evaluated using accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, and signal to noise ratio (SNR) as the evaluation criteria. The proposed end-to-end deep learning model for detecting atrial fibrillation in this study has achieved an accuracy rate of 99.20%, a specificity of 99.50%, a sensitivity of 99.50%, and a true positive rate of 99.00%. The average accuracy of the algorithms we compared is 96.26%, and our algorithm's accuracy is 3.2% higher than this average of the other algorithms. The CNN classification network performed better as compared to the other two. Additionally, the model is computationally efficient for real-time applications, and it takes approx 1.3 seconds to process 24 hours ECG signal. The proposed model was also tested on unseen dataset with different proportions of arrhythmias to examine the model's robustness, which resulted in 99.10% of recall and 98.50% of precision.