论文标题

美国主动脉闭塞疾病的参与者中的美国速度法

US Velocimetry in Participants with Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease

论文作者

Engelhard, Stefan, van Helvert, Majorie, Voorneveld, Jason, Bosch, Johan G, Lajoinie, Guillaume PR, Versluis, Michel, Jebbink, Erik Groot, Reijnen, Michel MPJ

论文摘要

主动脉动脉中血流的准确定量具有挑战性,但在临床上具有相关性,因为局部流动模式会影响动脉粥样硬化疾病。为了调查使用高率对比度增强的US(HFR-CEUS)和粒子图像速度法(PIV)或US Velocimetry的二维血流定量定量的可行性和临床应用。在这项前瞻性研究中,最近诊断出的主动脉狭窄的参与者接受了前和静脉后血管段的HFR-CEUS测量。通过进行PIV分析,基于HFR-CEUS图像的成对互相关来实现血流的二维定量。五位观察家对整个数据集进行了视觉检查,以评估该技术能够充分可视化血流的能力。计算了对比度与背景比和平均矢量相关性。在两个显示流动障碍的参与者中,计算了流动复杂性和涡度。结果:包括35名参与者。视觉评分表明,在42个位置中的41个中实现了流量定量。在25个位置,发生了一个或多个问题,即最佳流动量化有限,包括在收缩期期间的相关性丧失,阴影区域,图像平面中的短容器段以及舒张期间的对比度丧失。在其余的16个地点中,实现了最佳的定量。在收缩期期间的对比度与背景比高于舒张期,而矢量相关性较低。流动障碍的区域中的流动复杂性和涡度较高。使用美国速度测定的血流定量对于主动脉狭窄的患者是可行的,但是在实施临床实践之前,必须克服一些挑战。

The accurate quantification of blood flow in aortoiliac arteries is challenging but clinically relevant because local flow patterns can influence atherosclerotic disease. To investigate the feasibility and clinical application of two-dimensional blood flow quantification using high-frame-rate contrast-enhanced US (HFR-CEUS) and particle image velocimetry (PIV), or US velocimetry, in participants with aortoiliac stenosis. In this prospective study, participants with a recently diagnosed aortoiliac stenosis underwent HFR-CEUS measurements of the pre- and poststenotic vessel segments. Two-dimensional quantification of blood flow was achieved by performing PIV analysis, which was based on pairwise cross-correlation of the HFR-CEUS images. Visual inspection of the entire data set was performed by five observers to evaluate the ability of the technique to enable adequate visualization of blood flow. The contrast-to-background ratio and average vector correlation were calculated. In two participants who showed flow disturbances, the flow complexity and vorticity were calculated. Results: 35 participants were included. Visual scoring showed that flow quantification was achieved in 41 of 42 locations. In 25 locations, one or multiple issues occurred that limited optimal flow quantification, including loss of correlation during systole, shadow regions, a short vessel segment in the image plane, and loss of contrast during diastole. In the remaining 16 locations, optimal quantification was achieved. The contrast-to-background ratio was higher during systole than during diastole, whereas the vector correlation was lower. Flow complexity and vorticity were high in regions with disturbed flow. Blood flow quantification with US velocimetry is feasible in patients with an aortoiliac stenosis, but several challenges must be overcome before implementation into clinical practice.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源