论文标题
回复“ E. Snider等人对自然的评论586，373（2020）”。
Reply to "Comment on Nature 586, 373 (2020) by E. Snider et al."
论文作者
论文摘要
在本文中，我们回应了最近对CSH的工作的批评，（1,2）由Hirsch和van der Marel在Arxiv上（3）提出。我们指出，他们的未审查的批评（3）是由于缺乏科学理解或未能适当分析原始数据。我们解释说，其“未包装”方法的使用是不适当地执行的。 （3）我们提供了科学证据，表明其方法中使用的基本和根本性失败导致参考文献（3）中提出的错误表示。我们还注意到，在Hirsch和van der Marel在ARXIV上发表评论之前，Refs（1,2）的原始数据已提供给Hirsch。 （3）我们坚持参考文献（1,2）的发现和结论，并继续致力于科学研究的完整性。
In this paper, we respond to a recent criticism of our work on CSH, (1,2) raised by Hirsch and van der Marel on the arXiv (3). We point out that their non-peer reviewed critique (3) stems from either a lack of scientific understanding or a failure to appropriately analyze raw data. We explain that the use of their "Unwrapped" method was inappropriately performed. (3) We present scientific evidence that this basic and fundamental failure used in their method results in the false representations set forth in Ref (3). We also note that the raw data of Refs (1,2) were made available to Hirsch before he and van der Marel posted their comments on the arXiv. (3) We stand by the findings and conclusions of Refs (1,2) and remain committed to the integrity in scientific research.
