论文标题

回复对“正确和不当的手性磁相互作用”的评论''

Reply to 'Comment on "Proper and improper chiral magnetic interactions" '

论文作者

Dias, Manuel dos Santos, Brinker, Sascha, Lászlóffy, András, Nyári, Bendegúz, Blügel, Stefan, Szunyogh, László, Lounis, Samir

论文摘要

在我们以前的信中[物理学。 Rev. B 103,L140408(2021)],我们对与第一原理的参数化原子旋转模型的基本物理特性进行了讨论,该模型与第一原理方法有关,以实现其计算给定材料。这解释了其中一些方法显然如何导致不符合预期的物理特性的磁相互作用,例如非手持且与自旋轨道相互作用无关的dzyaloshinskii-moriya相互作用,因此我们称为“不当”。在前面的评论中[物理。 Rev. B 105,026401],作者根据使用第一原理计算来支持全球和局部方法之间的区别,以支持其拟议的非手持Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya互动及其对我们对“适当的'和````PORTICE)''磁性相互作用的区别。在此答复中,我们确定了映射的局部方法中缺少的步骤,并解释了忽略该步骤如何导致磁相互作用的识别,而磁相互作用不符合已建立的物理原理,并且我们以前称为“不当”。

In our previous Letter [Phys. Rev. B 103, L140408 (2021)], we presented a discussion of the fundamental physical properties of the interactions parameterizing atomistic spin models in connection to first-principles approaches that enable their calculation for a given material. This explained how some of those approaches can apparently lead to magnetic interactions that do not comply with the expected physical properties, such as Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions which are non-chiral and independent of the spin-orbit interaction, and which we consequently termed `improper'. In the preceding Comment [Phys. Rev. B 105, 026401], the authors present arguments based on the distinction between global and local approaches to the mapping of the magnetic energy using first-principles calculations to support their proposed non-chiral Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions and their dismissal of our distinction between `proper' and `improper' magnetic interactions. In this Reply, we identify the missing step in the local approach to the mapping and explain how ignoring this step leads to the identification of magnetic interactions which do not comply with established physical principles and that we have previously termed `improper'.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源