论文标题
Lorentzian的几何形状和飞机登机的可变性降低:慢速乘客首先优于随机登机
Lorentzian geometry and variability reduction in airplane boarding: Slow passengers first outperforms random boarding
论文作者
论文摘要
航空公司使用不同的登机政策来组织等待进入飞机的乘客队列。我们通过在队列位置的几何表示和每个乘客的行指定的几何表示,并应用Lorentzian指标来计算总登机时间,从而分析了多个乘客限制的三个策略。登机时间由每个乘客清除过道所需的时间支配,并且增加的时间由过道清除时间分布通过有效的过道清除时间参数确定。在共同的随机登机政策下的非组织队列的特征是有效的过道清理时间。我们表明,在所有现实情况下,通过大量数值计算对数学假设进行了验证,当缓慢的乘客与更快的乘客分离时,平均总登机时间始终会减少,并且允许慢速组首先进入飞机。这是一个普遍的结果,它适用于三个主要管理参数的任何组合:快速组的有效过道清除时间与慢速群体之间的比率,慢速乘客的比例和过道中的乘客的拥塞。基于过道清除时间分为组可以提供更多同步的座位,但是结果是不平凡的,因为相似的快速策略(两组以相反的顺序进入飞机)不如随机登机,用于一系列参数设置。渐近结果与具有现实数量的乘客数量的离散事件模拟非常符合,并且慢速和快速的策略都具有比随机登机的能力更好的能力。基于经验数据的参数,将手提行李作为将乘客分为慢组的标准,与随机登机相比,首先降低的总登机时间减少了13 \%。
Airlines use different boarding policies to organize the queue of passengers waiting to enter the airplane. We analyze three policies in the many-passenger limit by a geometric representation of the queue position and row designation of each passenger and apply a Lorentzian metric to calculate the total boarding time. The boarding time is governed by the time each passenger needs to clear the aisle, and the added time is determined by the aisle-clearing time distribution through an effective aisle-clearing time parameter. The non-organized queues under the common random boarding policy are characterized by large effective aisle-clearing time. We show that, subject to a mathematical assumption which we have verified by extensive numerical computations in all realistic cases, the average total boarding time is always reduced when slow passengers are separated from faster passengers and the slow group is allowed to enter the airplane first. This is a universal result that holds for any combination of the three main governing parameters: the ratio between effective aisle-clearing times of the fast and the slow group, the fraction of slow passenger, and the congestion of passengers in the aisle. Separation into groups based on aisle-clearing time allows for more synchronized seating, but the result is non-trivial, as the similar fast-first policy -- where the two groups enter the airplane in reverse order -- is inferior to random boarding for a range of parameter settings. The asymptotic results conform well with discrete-event simulations with realistic number of passengers, and both the slow-first and the fast-first policies have the ability to perform unboundedly better than random boarding. Parameters based on empirical data, with hand luggage as criteria for separating passengers into the slow group, give a 13\% reduction in total boarding time for slow first compared to random boarding.