论文标题
重新申请对主震的尺寸分布的影响
The Effect of Declustering on the Size Distribution of Mainshocks
论文作者
论文摘要
Declustring旨在将地震目录分为独立事件(主震)和依赖(聚集)事件,并且是许多地震性研究的组成部分,包括地震危害评估。我们评估了解释对主震的频率降压分布的影响。特别是,我们检查了被拆毁目录的B值对毁被算法方法和算法特异性参数的选择的依赖性。自1980年以来,使用加利福尼亚州的地震目录,我们表明,由于未凝集的目录,B值降低了30%。还原的程度高度取决于所应用的解释方法和参数。然后,我们通过使用已知的B值进行清理合成地震目录来重现类似的效果,该目录是使用流行型余震序列(ETAS)模型生成的。我们的分析表明,观察到的B值的下降至少部分是由于在目录上的申请算法的应用而产生的,而不是由主震动性质与前后震动的性质差异而产生。我们得出的结论是,毁灭性应被视为地震性和危害研究中偏见的潜在来源。
Declustering aims to divide earthquake catalogs into independent events (mainshocks), and dependent (clustered) events, and is an integral component of many seismicity studies, including seismic hazard assessment. We assess the effect of declustering on the frequency-magnitude distribution of mainshocks. In particular, we examine the dependence of the b-value of declustered catalogs on the choice of declustering approach and algorithm-specific parameters. Using the catalog of earthquakes in California since 1980, we show that the b-value decreases by up to 30% due to declustering with respect to the undeclustered catalog. The extent of the reduction is highly dependent on the declustering method and parameters applied. We then reproduce a similar effect by declustering synthetic earthquake catalogs with known b-value, which have been generated using an Epidemic-Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model. Our analysis suggests that the observed decrease in b-value must, at least partially, arise from the application of the declustering algorithm on the catalog, rather than from differences in the nature of mainshocks versus fore- or aftershocks. We conclude that declustering should be considered as a potential source of bias in seismicity and hazard studies.