论文标题
电动汽车电池剩余的充电时间估算考虑充电精度和充电概况预测
Electric Vehicle Battery Remaining Charging Time Estimation Considering Charging Accuracy and Charging Profile Prediction
论文作者
论文摘要
近年来,电动汽车(EV)的流行迅速,并已成为未来的趋势。自信地了解电动汽车的剩余充电时间(RCT)是用户体验的一个重要方面。但是,很难找到一种准确估算当前电动汽车市场中车辆的RCT的算法。特斯拉型X模型的最大RCT估计误差可以高达60分钟,从直流电流(DC)充电时,从10%到99%的电荷(SOC)。电动汽车的高度准确的RCT估计算法的需求很高,随着电动汽车变得越来越流行,电动汽车的需求将继续存在。目前,到达准确的RCT估计值有两个挑战。首先,大多数商业充电器无法在恒定电流(CC)阶段提供所需的充电电流。其次,很难在恒定电压(CV)阶段预测充电电流轮廓。为了解决第一个问题,本研究提出了一种RCT算法,该算法通过考虑历史充电精度和实时充电精度数据之间的置信区间,在CC阶段更新充电精度。为了解决第二个问题,本研究提出了一个电池电阻预测模型,以使用径向基函数(RBF)神经网络(NN)预测CV阶段中充电的电流曲线。测试结果表明,本研究中提出的RCT算法分别比CC和CV阶段的传统方法的错误率提高了73.6%和84.4%。
Electric vehicles (EVs) have been growing rapidly in popularity in recent years and have become a future trend. It is an important aspect of user experience to know the Remaining Charging Time (RCT) of an EV with confidence. However, it is difficult to find an algorithm that accurately estimates the RCT for vehicles in the current EV market. The maximum RCT estimation error of the Tesla Model X can be as high as 60 minutes from a 10 % to 99 % state-of-charge (SOC) while charging at direct current (DC). A highly accurate RCT estimation algorithm for electric vehicles is in high demand and will continue to be as EVs become more popular. There are currently two challenges to arriving at an accurate RCT estimate. First, most commercial chargers cannot provide requested charging currents during a constant current (CC) stage. Second, it is hard to predict the charging current profile in a constant voltage (CV) stage. To address the first issue, this study proposes an RCT algorithm that updates the charging accuracy online in the CC stage by considering the confidence interval between the historical charging accuracy and real-time charging accuracy data. To solve the second issue, this study proposes a battery resistance prediction model to predict charging current profiles in the CV stage, using a Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network (NN). The test results demonstrate that the RCT algorithm proposed in this study achieves an error rate improvement of 73.6 % and 84.4 % over the traditional method in the CC and CV stages, respectively.