论文标题

IAM单位化中系统理论不确定性的评估

Assessment of systematic theory uncertainties in IAM unitarization

论文作者

Escudero-Pedrosa, Juan, Llanes-Estrada, Felipe J., Oller, José Antonio, Salas-Bernárdez, Alexandre

论文摘要

低阶的金石玻色子散射的有效野外理论(EFTS)可以根据计数排列的一些系数来计算接近阈值可观察的。从原则上讲,它们应该有意义地达到能量量表$ e \ sim4πf$,但是动量的扩展违反了精确的弹性单位性,并使派生的扩展在较低的能量下不可靠。如果发现并以低能量系数发现并编码新的 - 物理学偏差,也许是在LHC处,将EFT范围扩展到部分波的偏向型单位性饱和的状态将是有利可图的。强子物理学中称为“单位性手性扰动理论”的方法将EFT扩展到其名义覆盖范围,或者在部分波幅度的第一个新的物理学共振或结构(如果在该能量范围以下)中,但它们通常没有未知的不确定性。我们概括了对众所周知的反振幅方法(IAM)的系统理论不确定性的分析。

Effective Field Theories (EFTs) for Goldstone Boson scattering at a low order allow the computation of near--threshold observables in terms of a few coefficients arranged by a counting. As a matter of principle they should make sense up to an energy scale $E\sim 4πF$ but the expansion in powers of momentum violates exact elastic unitarity and renders the derivative expansion unreliable at much lower energies. If new--physics deviations from the Standard Model are found and encoded in low-energy coefficients, perhaps at the LHC, it will be profitable to extend the reach of the EFT to regimes where partial waves are saturating unitarity. The methods known in hadron physics as "Unitarized Chiral Perturbation Theory" extend the EFT up to its nominal reach or up to the first new physics resonance or structure (if found below that energy reach) in the partial wave amplitude, but they usually have unknown uncertainties. We recapitulate our analysis of the systematic theory uncertainties of the well known Inverse Amplitude Method (IAM).

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源