论文标题

有关联合学习的系统文献综述:从模型质量的角度来看

A Systematic Literature Review on Federated Learning: From A Model Quality Perspective

论文作者

Liu, Yi, Zhang, Li, Ge, Ning, Li, Guanghao

论文摘要

作为一种新兴技术,联邦学习(FL)可以通过局部数据共同训练全球模型,从而有效地通过加密机制解决了数据隐私保护问题。客户培训其本地模型,服务器汇总模型直至收敛。在此过程中,服务器使用激励机制来鼓励客户贡献高质量和大容量数据以改善全球模型。尽管有些作品已将FL应用于物联网(IoT),医学,制造等,但FL的应用仍处于起步阶段,需要解决许多相关问题。提高FL模型的质量是当前的研究热点和具有挑战性的任务。本文系统地审查并客观地分析了提高FL模型质量的方法。我们还对FL的研究和应用趋势以及FL和非FL之间的效果比较感兴趣,因为从业者通常担心实现隐私保护需要损害学习质量。我们使用系统的审查方法来分析与FL相关的147条最新文章。这篇评论为学术界和行业的从业者提供了有用的信息和见解。我们研究了有关FL的学术研究和工业应用趋势的研究问题,影响FL模型质量的基本因素,并在学习质量方面比较FL和非FL算法。根据我们的评论的结论,我们给出了一些提高FL模型质量的建议。最后,我们为从业人员提出了FL应用程序框架。

As an emerging technique, Federated Learning (FL) can jointly train a global model with the data remaining locally, which effectively solves the problem of data privacy protection through the encryption mechanism. The clients train their local model, and the server aggregates models until convergence. In this process, the server uses an incentive mechanism to encourage clients to contribute high-quality and large-volume data to improve the global model. Although some works have applied FL to the Internet of Things (IoT), medicine, manufacturing, etc., the application of FL is still in its infancy, and many related issues need to be solved. Improving the quality of FL models is one of the current research hotspots and challenging tasks. This paper systematically reviews and objectively analyzes the approaches to improving the quality of FL models. We are also interested in the research and application trends of FL and the effect comparison between FL and non-FL because the practitioners usually worry that achieving privacy protection needs compromising learning quality. We use a systematic review method to analyze 147 latest articles related to FL. This review provides useful information and insights to both academia and practitioners from the industry. We investigate research questions about academic research and industrial application trends of FL, essential factors affecting the quality of FL models, and compare FL and non-FL algorithms in terms of learning quality. Based on our review's conclusion, we give some suggestions for improving the FL model quality. Finally, we propose an FL application framework for practitioners.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源