论文标题
COVID-19和社会距离:收入群体之间移动适应的差异
COVID-19 and Social Distancing: Disparities in Mobility Adaptation between Income Groups
论文作者
论文摘要
为了应对2019年冠状病毒病(Covid-19)的大流行,政府鼓励并命令公民实践社会疏远,尤其是通过在家工作和学习。直觉上,只有一部分人有能力练习远程工作。但是,关于大流行期间,美国城市不同收入群体的流动适应差异的研究很少。作者通过量化德克萨斯州大休斯顿的收入对大流行对人类流动的影响来填补这一空白。在本文中,我们使用假名,空间分解的手机位置数据确定了人类流动性。与基线中的数据相比,2020年4月的总行进距离,回转的半径,访问地点的数量和每次旅行距离进行了一项跨估计收入组的纵向研究。在估计的收入群体中发现了移动性的明显差异。特别是,四月的旅行者的估计收入与旅行距离之间存在很强的负相关性($ρ$ = -0.90)。进一步显示了移动适应性的差异,因为与低收入括号中的收入范围较高的括号中的差异相比,回旋的半径较高的人数较高,而访问的位置的数量更大。这项研究的结果表明,有必要了解大流行期间低收入人群的流动性不灵活性背后的原因。这项研究阐明了一个公平问题,这对于政策制定者和研究人员都可能引起了人们的关注。
In response to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, governments have encouraged and ordered citizens to practice social distancing, particularly by working and studying at home. Intuitively, only a subset of people have the ability to practice remote work. However, there has been little research on the disparity of mobility adaptation across different income groups in US cities during the pandemic. The authors worked to fill this gap by quantifying the impacts of the pandemic on human mobility by income in Greater Houston, Texas. In this paper, we determined human mobility using pseudonymized, spatially disaggregated cell phone location data. A longitudinal study across estimated income groups was conducted by measuring the total travel distance, radius of gyration, number of visited locations, and per-trip distance in April 2020 compared to the data in a baseline. An apparent disparity in mobility was found across estimated income groups. In particular, there was a strong negative correlation ($ρ$ = -0.90) between a traveler's estimated income and travel distance in April. Disparities in mobility adaptability were further shown since those in higher income brackets experienced larger percentage drops in the radius of gyration and the number of distinct visited locations than did those in lower income brackets. The findings of this study suggest a need to understand the reasons behind the mobility inflexibility among low-income populations during the pandemic. The study illuminates an equity issue which may be of interest to policy makers and researchers alike in the wake of an epidemic.