论文标题

好校长还是“老大哥”? AI伦理和在线考试监督技术

Good proctor or "Big Brother"? AI Ethics and Online Exam Supervision Technologies

论文作者

Coghlan, Simon, Miller, Tim, Paterson, Jeannie

论文摘要

本文从哲学上分析了在线考试监督技术,由于校园锁定在19日期期间的校园锁定以及对在线课程的需求不断增长,这些技术因校园锁定而引起了公众的关注。在线考试探测技术旨在使用人工智能(AI)系统和人类的监护人来补充和审查这些系统,以有效地监督坐在线考试的学生。这样的技术使一些认为他们像“大哥”的学生感到震惊,但一些大学捍卫了他们明智的使用。在线监管技术的关键道德评估逾期。本文从哲学上分析了这些技术,重点介绍了学术诚信,公平,非遗憾,透明度,隐私,对自治,自由,自由和信任的道德概念。这些概念中的大多数在AI伦理的新领域都很突出,并且所有这些概念都与教育背景有关。本文提供了道德考虑,教育机构将需要在选择部署和管理特定在线销售技术之前仔细审查。

This article philosophically analyzes online exam supervision technologies, which have been thrust into the public spotlight due to campus lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic and the growing demand for online courses. Online exam proctoring technologies purport to provide effective oversight of students sitting online exams, using artificial intelligence (AI) systems and human invigilators to supplement and review those systems. Such technologies have alarmed some students who see them as `Big Brother-like', yet some universities defend their judicious use. Critical ethical appraisal of online proctoring technologies is overdue. This article philosophically analyzes these technologies, focusing on the ethical concepts of academic integrity, fairness, non-maleficence, transparency, privacy, respect for autonomy, liberty, and trust. Most of these concepts are prominent in the new field of AI ethics and all are relevant to the education context. The essay provides ethical considerations that educational institutions will need to carefully review before electing to deploy and govern specific online proctoring technologies.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源