论文标题
乌克兰科学的集体作者身份：边际效应还是新现象？
Collective authorship in Ukrainian science: marginal effect or new phenomenon?
论文作者
论文摘要
现代科学的特征之一是建立了稳定的大型研究人员在需要集中大量金融和人力资源的项目中共同努力的大型合作。大型共同创作团队有时包括成千上万的名字，在科学论文中发表了这种共同工作的结果。这项工作的目的是研究此类出版物对一般乌克兰的个人，研究小组和科学计算的科学计量指标价值的影响。与乌克兰有关的书目数据，一些学术机构和选定的个人研究人员是从Scopus数据库中收集的，并用于我们的研究。证明，尽管集体作者的相对出版物相对较小，但它们在一般池中的存在可能会导致统计学上的显着影响。获得的结果清楚地表明，应更改用于研究评估的传统定量方法，以便考虑到这一现象。关键词：集体作者身份，科学计量学，小组科学，乌克兰。
One of the features of modern science is the formation of stable large collaborations of researchers working together within the projects that require the concentration of huge financial and human resources. Results of such common work are published in scientific papers by large co-authorship teams that include sometimes thousands of names. The goal of this work is to study the influence of such publications on the values of scientometric indicators calculated for individuals, research groups and science of Ukraine in general. Bibliometric data related to Ukraine, some academic institutions and selected individual researchers were collected from Scopus database and used for our study. It is demonstrated that while the relative share of publications by collective authors is comparatively small, their presence in a general pool can lead to statistically significant effects. The obtained results clearly show that traditional quantitative approaches for research assessment should be changed in order to take into account this phenomenon. Keywords: collective authorship, scientometrics, group science, Ukraine.
