论文标题
从被动到主动:在传输系统开发的背景下电动汽车的灵活性
From passive to active: Flexibility from electric vehicles in the context of transmission system development
论文作者
论文摘要
基于RES的电力系统中传输的电气将支持运输部门的脱碳。 但是,由于能源需求的增加和充电的巨大影响,电动汽车的被动整合可能会破坏可持续性的努力。 这项研究调查了欧洲电动汽车的三种不同收费策略,提供了各种灵活性:被动充电,智能充电和车辆到网格,并将这种灵活性视为透视,并具有InterConnections提供的灵活性。 我们使用Balmorel优化工具来表示能源系统中的短期调度和长期投资,并为开发新的Methodogyogiesto代表家庭充电和电池退化做出了贡献。 我们的结果表明,增加充电性的每个步骤如何降低系统成本,影响能源混合,影响现货价格并降低二氧化碳排放量直到2050年的地平线。我们量化了如何相互支持的柔性充电和可变发电量如何相互支持(2050中的风能和太阳能在2050年中的能量)并通过固定电池进行替代量的替代品来限制替代品的商用式供电。 在电气运输的背景下,每个充电示意图和没有相互联系的扩展的比较突出了欧洲国家之间的相互作用。 尽管在欧盟一级最灵活的情况下,最好的结果是在欧盟最便宜的情况下造成的,但最便宜和最脱碳的电力组合的国家的状况受到损害,这要求在欧盟一级进行适应的协调政策。
Electrification of transport in RES-based power system will support the decarbonisation of the transportsector. However, due to the increase in energy demand and the large peak effects of charging, the passiveintegration of electric cars is likely to undermine sustainability efforts. This study investigates three differentcharging strategies for electric vehicle in Europe offering various degrees of flexibility: passive charging,smart charging and vehicle-to-grid, and puts this flexibility in perspective with the flexibility offered byinterconnections. We use the Balmorel optimization tool to represent the short-term dispatch and long-terminvestment in the energy system and we contribute to the state-of-the-art in developing new methodologiesto represent home charging and battery degradation. Our results show how each step of increased chargingflexibility reduces system costs, affects energy mix, impacts spot prices and reduces CO2 emissions untilthe horizon 2050. We quantify how flexible charging and variable generation mutually support each other(¿100TWh from wind and solar energy in 2050) and restrict the business case for stationary batteries, whereaspassive charging results in a substitution of wind by solar energy. The comparison of each charging schemewith and without interconnection expansion highlights the interplay between European countries in terms ofelectricity prices and CO2 emissions in the context of electrified transport. Although the best outcome isreached under the most flexible scenario at the EU level, the situation of the countries with the cheapest andmost decarbonised electricity mix is damaged, which calls for adapted coordination policy at the EU level.