论文标题

SDSS J143359.16+400636.0中的发光X射线瞬变:可能的潮汐破坏事件

A luminous X-ray transient in SDSS J143359.16+400636.0: a likely tidal disruption event

论文作者

Brightman, Murray, Ward, Charlotte, Stern, Daniel, Mooley, Kunal, De, Kishalay, Gezari, Suvi, Van Velzen, Sjoert, Andreoni, Igor, Graham, Matthew, Masci, Frank J., Riddle, Reed, Zolkower, Jeffry

论文摘要

我们介绍了一个发光X射线瞬态的发现,该瞬态在2月5日由Swift的X射线望远镜(XRT)检测到,位于Galaxy SDSS SDSS J143359.16+400636.0 AT Z = 0.099(Luminosity decance $ d $ D _} = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456 = 456.观察到瞬态是达到$ \ sim10^{44} $ erg s $^{ - 1} $的峰值光度,在0.3---10 kev X射线频带中,该频段是$ \ sim20 $ \ sim20 $ $倍,比峰值光学/UV亮度高。来自Zwicky瞬态设施(ZTF)和Swift的光学,UV和X射线灯曲面显示出与$ T^{ - 5/3} $一致的源的通量下降,并且与Nustar和Chandra的观察显示了柔软的X射线频谱,带有光子指数$γ= 2.9 \ pm0.1 $。 X射线/UV性能与众所周知的AGN特性不一致,并且与已知的X射线潮汐破坏事件(TDE)有更多共同点,这使我们得出结论,它可能是TDE。宽带光谱能量分布(SED)可以通过磁盘黑体模型很好地描述,内部磁盘温度为$ 7.3^{+0.3} _ { - 0.8} \ times10^{5} $ k,磁盘发射的大量($> 40 $%)的磁盘发射中划分为X射线频带。 X射线检测后用Keck/LRIS拍摄的光谱揭示了宿主银河系中的衬里线比,这表明事件发生前的超质量黑孔,但没有看到TDE的宽线或其他指示。恒星速度分散剂意味着为活动提供动力的超级质量黑洞的质量是($ m _ {\ rm bh} $/$/$ m _ {\ odot} $)$ = 7.41 \ pm0.41 $,我们估计该活动的Eddington Fraction fractions of Eddington fraction是$ 50%$ \ sim $ 50%。这种可能的TDE并未通过宽场光学调查或光学光谱法识别出来,表明没有宽场紫外线或X射线调查会错过更多此类事件。

We present the discovery of a luminous X-ray transient, serendipitously detected by Swift's X-ray Telescope (XRT) on 2020 February 5, located in the nucleus of the galaxy SDSS J143359.16+400636.0 at z=0.099 (luminosity distance $D_{\rm L}=456$ Mpc). The transient was observed to reach a peak luminosity of $\sim10^{44}$ erg s$^{-1}$ in the 0.3--10 keV X-ray band, which was $\sim20$ times more than the peak optical/UV luminosity. Optical, UV, and X-ray lightcurves from the Zwicky Transient Facility (ZTF) and Swift show a decline in flux from the source consistent with $t^{-5/3}$, and observations with NuSTAR and Chandra show a soft X-ray spectrum with photon index $Γ=2.9\pm0.1$. The X-ray/UV properties are inconsistent with well known AGN properties and have more in common with known X-ray tidal disruption events (TDE), leading us to conclude that it was likely a TDE. The broadband spectral energy distribution (SED) can be described well by a disk blackbody model with an inner disk temperature of $7.3^{+0.3}_{-0.8}\times10^{5}$ K, with a large fraction ($>40$%) of the disk emission up-scattered into the X-ray band. An optical spectrum taken with Keck/LRIS after the X-ray detection reveals LINER line ratios in the host galaxy, suggesting low-level accretion on to the supermassive black hole prior to the event, but no broad lines or other indications of a TDE were seen. The stellar velocity dispersion implies the mass of the supermassive black hole powering the event is log($M_{\rm BH}$/$M_{\odot}$)$=7.41\pm0.41$, and we estimate that at peak the Eddington fraction of this event was $\sim$50%. This likely TDE was not identified by wide-field optical surveys, nor optical spectroscopy, indicating that more events like this would be missed without wide-field UV or X-ray surveys.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源