论文标题
盖亚(Gaia
Gaia view of a stellar sub-structure in front of the Small Magellanic Cloud
论文作者
论文摘要
最近的观察性研究确定了一个由红色团块(RC)星(RC)恒星(在主体前面〜12 kpc)所追踪的前景恒星结构。先前的研究研究了由于数据的空间覆盖率有限,因此从SMC中心仅高达4.0度,因此找不到与MB的物理联系。为了确定该前景群体的空间范围和特性,我们分析了以SMC为中心的agaia数据版本2(DR2)的数据,该数据涵盖了整个SMC和MB的大部分。我们发现,前景种群仅存在于东部地区SMC中心的2.5度至5-6度之间,朝向MB,因此并未完全与天空平面的MB完全重叠。发现前景恒星种群在运动学上与主体的恒星种群不同,分别速度较慢,切向速度较慢,并且相对于主体移动到西北。尽管观察到的特性与模拟不完全一致,但比较表明前景恒星结构很可能是气态MB的潮汐剥离对应物,并且可能是由SMC的内盘(主导)形成的。需要对RC恒星进行的化学和3D运动学研究以及改进的模拟,包括潮汐和水力动力效应,以了解前景结构与MB之间的偏移。
Recent observational studies identified a foreground stellar sub-structure traced by red clump (RC) stars (~ 12 kpc in front of the main body) in the eastern regions of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC) and suggested that it formed during the formation of the Magellanic Bridge (MB), due to the tidal interaction of the Magellanic Clouds. Previous studies investigated this feature only up to 4.0 deg from the centre of the SMC due to the limited spatial coverage of the data and hence could not find a physical connection with the MB. To determine the spatial extent and properties of this foreground population, we analysed data from the Gaia data release 2 (DR2) of a ~ 314 sq. deg region centred on the SMC, which cover the entire SMC and a significant portion of the MB. We find that the foreground population is present only between 2.5 deg to ~ 5-6 deg from the centre of the SMC in the eastern regions, towards the MB and hence does not fully overlap with the MB in the plane of the sky. The foreground stellar population is found to be kinematically distinct from the stellar population of the main body with ~ 35 km/s slower tangential velocity and moving to the North-West relative to the main body. Though the observed properties are not fully consistent with the simulations, a comparison indicates that the foreground stellar structure is most likely a tidally stripped counterpart of the gaseous MB and might have formed from the inner disc (dominated by stars) of the SMC. A chemical and 3D kinematic study of the RC stars along with improved simulations, including both tidal and hydro-dynamical effects, are required to understand the offset between the foreground structure and MB.