论文标题
公共区块链系统中集中化的分类学:系统文献综述
Taxonomy of Centralization in Public Blockchain Systems: A Systematic Literature Review
论文作者
论文摘要
比特币将对货币系统的控制权从少数几个参与该系统进行了控制。该代表团被称为控制权的权力分散化,是生态系统的强大安全机制。在引入比特币之后,加密货币领域引起了行业和学术界的广泛关注,以至于比特币的原始新颖贡献,即权力下放,由于分散的基本化存在,可以被忽略。然而,最近的研究观察到在比特币和以太坊等加密货币中集中化增加的趋势。由于这种增加的集中化会影响区块链的安全性,因此对其进行了至关重要的衡量,以实现足够的控制。这项研究通过使用系统文献综述,通过严格的合成来得出了分散区块链中集中化的初步分类。接下来是通过专家访谈的迭代精炼。我们系统地分析了2009年至2019年之间发表的89篇研究论文。我们的研究通过强调文献中集中化的多重定义和测量来为现有的知识体系做出了贡献。我们确定集中化的不同方面,并提出了集中化问题的包含分类法。该分类法基于经验可观察到的可测量特征。它由六个建筑层的统治网络共识激励运营和应用程序组成的13个集中化方面。我们还讨论了集中化的含义如何根据所研究的方面有所不同。我们认为,这篇综述和分类法提供了涉及各种概念化和措施的分散区块链中集中化的全面概述。
Bitcoin introduced delegation of control over a monetary system from a select few to all who participate in that system. This delegation is known as the decentralization of controlling power and is a powerful security mechanism for the ecosystem. After the introduction of Bitcoin, the field of cryptocurrency has seen widespread attention from industry and academia, so much so that the original novel contribution of Bitcoin i.e. decentralization, may be overlooked, due to decentralizations assumed fundamental existence for the functioning of such cryptoassets. However recent studies have observed a trend of increased centralization in cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin and Ethereum. As this increased centralization has an impact the security of the blockchain, it is crucial that it is measured, towards adequate control. This research derives an initial taxonomy of centralization present in decentralized blockchains through rigorous synthesis using a systematic literature review. This is followed by iterative refinement through expert interviews. We systematically analyzed 89 research papers published between 2009 and 2019. Our study contributes to the existing body of knowledge by highlighting the multiple definitions and measurements of centralization in the literature. We identify different aspects of centralization and propose an encompassing taxonomy of centralization concerns. This taxonomy is based on empirically observable and measurable characteristics. It consists of 13 aspects of centralization classified over six architectural layers Governance Network Consensus Incentive Operational and Application. We also discuss how the implications of centralization can vary depending on the aspects studied. We believe that this review and taxonomy provides a comprehensive overview of centralization in decentralized blockchains involving various conceptualizations and measures.