论文标题
AI和法律论证：使AI法律推理的自动级别保持一致
AI and Legal Argumentation: Aligning the Autonomous Levels of AI Legal Reasoning
论文作者
论文摘要
法律论证是司法的重要基石，是法律的对抗性形式的基础，广泛的研究试图通过使用基于计算机的自动化（包括人工智能（AI））来增强或进行法律论证。 AI自然语言处理（NLP）和机器学习（ML）的进步尤其进一步提高了利用AI来帮助法律专业人员的能力，以在此建模为CARE，即制定，评估，精炼和参与法律论证的方式进行。除了启用AI的法律论点以扩大人类基于人类的律师事务外，该多学科领域的理想目标还包括最终实现自主影响的人类等效法律论证。因此，提出了一种创新的元信息，以将AI法律推理（AILR）的自治水平（LOA）应用于AI和法律论证（AILA）的成熟（AILA），从而在这个不断发展且严格寻求的领域中提出了一种新的进步手段。
Legal argumentation is a vital cornerstone of justice, underpinning an adversarial form of law, and extensive research has attempted to augment or undertake legal argumentation via the use of computer-based automation including Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI advances in Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Machine Learning (ML) have especially furthered the capabilities of leveraging AI for aiding legal professionals, doing so in ways that are modeled here as CARE, namely Crafting, Assessing, Refining, and Engaging in legal argumentation. In addition to AI-enabled legal argumentation serving to augment human-based lawyering, an aspirational goal of this multi-disciplinary field consists of ultimately achieving autonomously effected human-equivalent legal argumentation. As such, an innovative meta-approach is proposed to apply the Levels of Autonomy (LoA) of AI Legal Reasoning (AILR) to the maturation of AI and Legal Argumentation (AILA), proffering a new means of gauging progress in this ever-evolving and rigorously sought domain.
