论文标题
仪表自由对非递归量子电动力学的含义
Implications of gauge freedom for nonrelativistic quantum electrodynamics
论文作者
论文摘要
审查了教科书制度之外的量子电动力学量规(QED)。有人强调,QED子系统是相对于仪表选择的定义的。每个定义都使用不同的量规不变的可观测值。仅当采用了足够数量的马尔可夫和弱耦合近似值时,才能消除这种相对性。所有物理预测都是规格不变的,包括子系统属性,例如光子数和纠缠。但是,子系统属性自然在不同的物理子系统上有所不同。衡量歧义之所以出现,不是因为尚不清楚如何获得规格不变的预测,而是因为并不总是清楚哪种物理可观察物在操作上最相关。预测的规格不变性是必要的,但不足以确保其运营相关性。结果表明,在控制哪种规格不变的可观察物来定义材料系统时,仪表的选择会影响材料系统的定位及其电磁敷料之间的平衡。综述了子系统仪表相对性对得出有效模型,描述时间依赖性相互作用,光相检测理论以及描述腔内物质的各种含义。
Gauge freedom in quantum electrodynamics (QED) outside of textbook regimes is reviewed. It is emphasized that QED subsystems are defined relative to a choice of gauge. Each definition uses different gauge-invariant observables. This relativity is eliminated only if a sufficient number of Markovian and weak-coupling approximations are employed. All physical predictions are gauge invariant, including subsystem properties such as photon number and entanglement. However, subsystem properties naturally differ for different physical subsystems. Gauge ambiguities arise not because it is unclear how to obtain gauge-invariant predictions, but because it is not always clear which physical observables are the most operationally relevant. The gauge invariance of a prediction is necessary but not sufficient to ensure its operational relevance. It is shown that, in controlling which gauge invariant observables are used to define a material system, the choice of gauge affects the balance between the material system's localization and its electromagnetic dressing. Various implications of subsystem gauge relativity for deriving effective models, for describing time-dependent interactions, for photodetection theory, and for describing matter within a cavity are reviewed.