论文标题
大约在社会上的分散式联盟形成,并应用于P2P能源共享
Approximately Socially-Optimal Decentralized Coalition Formation with Application to P2P Energy Sharing
论文作者
论文摘要
P2P(点对点)经济的范式在不同地区出现。 “ P2P能源共享”是能源领域P2P经济的一种新形式,它允许用户建立其本地能源资源(例如,屋顶PVS,家庭电池)的长期共享安排,并具有优化的能源管理。在这样的P2P设置中,由用户组成了一个用户联盟,以通过个人的偏好来分散方式分享资源。分散联盟形成的可能结果将是一个稳定的联盟结构,在此结构中,没有一个用户可以合作地选择组建另一个联盟,从而引起对所有成员的更高偏好。值得注意的是,有许多公平成本分担的机制(例如,等级,比例分裂,比例分类,平等和纳什谈判解决方案),这些解决方案的实践成本分布的应用具有所需的性能,例如具有稳定的集合结构,具有稳定的合作结构,具有稳定的稳定的合作型,以较小的强大价格(Spoa)可用(Spoa)可用来实现。在本文中,我们提供了分散联盟形成的一般结果:(1)我们在SPOA上建立了对数下限,因此,显示了几种先前已知的公平成本分担机制是最佳的SPOA的最佳实用机制。 (2)我们表明,平等和纳什议价成本分担机制的Spoa与下边界相匹配。 (3)我们得出了不同成本分担机制的混合物的SPOA。 (4)我们提出了一种分散的算法,以形成稳定的联盟结构。 (5)最后,我们将一般结果应用于P2P能源共享,并在现实世界中对分散联盟形成的经验研究。我们研究经验SPOA,通过合理的成本分担机制在社会最佳成本的95%之内观察到,这是在社会最佳成本中观察到的。
The paradigm of P2P (peer-to-peer) economy has emerged in diverse areas. "P2P energy sharing" is a new form of P2P economy in the energy sector, which allows users to establish longer-term sharing arrangements of their local energy resources (e.g., rooftop PVs, home batteries) with joint optimized energy management. In such a P2P setting, a coalition of users is formed for sharing resources in a decentralized manner by self-interested users based on their individual preferences. A likely outcome of decentralized coalition formation will be a stable coalition structure, where no group of users could cooperatively opt out to form another coalition that induces higher preferences to all its members. Remarkably, there exist a number of fair cost-sharing mechanisms (e.g., equal-split, proportional-split, egalitarian and Nash bargaining solutions of bargaining games) that model practical cost-sharing applications with desirable properties, such as the existence of a stable coalition structure with a small strong price-of-anarchy (SPoA) to approximate the social optimum. In this paper, we provide general results of decentralized coalition formation: (1) We establish a logarithmic lower bound on SPoA, and hence, show several previously known fair cost-sharing mechanisms are the best practical mechanisms with minimal SPoA. (2) We show that the SPoA of egalitarian and Nash bargaining cost-sharing mechanisms to match the lower bound. (3) We derive the SPoA of a mix of different cost-sharing mechanisms. (4) We present a decentralized algorithm to form a stable coalition structure. (5) Finally, we apply our general results to P2P energy sharing and present an empirical study of decentralized coalition formation in a real-world project. We study the empirical SPoA, which is observed within 95% of the social optimal cost with coalitions of 2 and 3 users, via fair cost-sharing mechanisms.