论文标题

重新审视强度干涉学理论

The theory of intensity interferometry revisited

论文作者

Saha, Prasenjit

论文摘要

随着目前对天文强度干涉率的兴趣的复兴,重新审视相关理论的有趣,该理论是在1950年代和1960年代开发的。本文认为,强度干涉法可以理解为Fraunhofer衍射到不连贯的光的扩展。仍会产生干扰模式,但它们类似斑点和瞬态,以$ 1/Δν$($Δν$为频率带宽)的时间尺度变化,称为相干时间。明亮的条纹平均每个相干时间少于一个光子,因此在观察到的条纹变化。但是很有偶尔,可以在连贯的时间内从干扰模式中检测到两个或更多的光子。这些罕见的一致光子提供了有关潜在瞬态干扰模式的信息,因此提供了有关源亮度分布的信息。从瞬态亚光子干扰模式方面进行思考,可以轻松了解为什么强度干涉仪具有较大的光学路径耐受性,并且可以免疫大气看。异常的信号到噪声属性也变得明显。我们用三个模拟示例说明了不可观察但有用的瞬态干扰模式及其可观察的相关信号:(i)像Achernar这样的细长来源((ii)Algol,例如Algol等三星级系统,以及(iii)一个新月源,它大致模拟了系质传输或M87黑洞环境。其中(i)和(ii)是当前计划的设置的好目标,而(iii)长期考虑考虑。

With the current revival of interest in astronomical intensity interferometry, it is interesting to revisit the associated theory, which was developed in the 1950s and 1960s. This paper argues that intensity interferometry can be understood as an extension of Fraunhofer diffraction to incoherent light. Interference patterns are still produced, but they are speckle-like and transient, changing on a time scale of $1/Δν$ (where $Δν$ is the frequency bandwidth) known as the coherence time. Bright fringes average less than one photon per coherence time, hence fringes change before they can be observed. But very occasionally, two or even more photons may be detected from an interference pattern within a coherence time. These rare coincident photons provide information about the underlying transient interference pattern, and hence about the source brightness distribution. Thinking in terms of transient sub-photon interference patterns makes it easy to see why intensity interferometry will have large optical-path tolerance, and be immune to atmospheric seeing. The unusual signal-to-noise properties also become evident. We illustrate the unobservable but conceptually useful transient interference patterns, and their observable correlation signal, with three simulated examples: (i) an elongated source like Achernar, (ii) a three-star system like Algol, and (iii) a crescent source that roughly mimics an exoplanet transit or perhaps the M87 black hole environment. Of these, (i) and (ii) are good targets for currently-planned setups, while (iii) is interesting to think about for the longer term.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源