论文标题
援引和引用2019年医学和社会科学期刊的习惯
Citing and referencing habits in Medicine and Social Sciences journals in 2019
论文作者
论文摘要
本文从不同的理论和实践角度探讨了社会科学和医学文章中的引用和参考系统,将书目参考作为描述性表示的方面。对引用和引用元素的分析(即书目参考,提及,引文和相应的文本参考指针)确定了所考虑的学科中的引用和参考习惯,以及以前研究的长期所述的误差,现在已经扩展了。通过接近FRBR实体概念的这些参考元素,从参考书目元数据中获取信息检索的未来预期趋势。参考风格在指导作者和出版商方面的作用并未完全完成,在书目参考文献中提供简洁且结构良好的书目元数据。代表性描述的趋势修订版本表明,书目参考文献和书目目录采用了FRBR概念,其中包括每个人在FRBR实体概念的角度采用的描述级别。这项研究基于2019年发表的医学和社会科学文章的一部分,因此,它不可能被视为最终和广泛的报道。鼓励将这些方法扩展到其他学科和年代时期的未来研究。通过引用和引用问题作为描述性表示的方面,这项研究的发现可能会鼓励进一步的研究,这些研究将支持信息科学和计算机科学,以提供工具,以成为书目元数据描述实际上正在进行中,更简单,结构化和更有效地面对描述性表示的修订。
This article explores citing and referencing systems in Social Sciences and Medicine articles from different theoretical and practical perspectives, considering bibliographic references as a facet of descriptive representation. The analysis of citing and referencing elements (i.e. bibliographic references, mentions, quotations, and respective in-text reference pointers) identified citing and referencing habits within disciplines under consideration and errors occurring over the long term as stated by previous studies now expanded. Future expected trends of information retrieval from bibliographic metadata was gathered by approaching these referencing elements from the FRBR Entities concepts. Reference styles do not fully accomplish with their role of guiding authors and publishers on providing concise and well-structured bibliographic metadata within bibliographic references. Trends on representative description revision suggest a predicted distancing on the ways information is approached by bibliographic references and bibliographic catalogs adopting FRBR concepts, including the description levels adopted by each of them under the perspective of the FRBR Entities concept. This study was based on a subset of Medicine and Social Sciences articles published in 2019 and, therefore, it may not be taken as a final and broad coverage. Future studies expanding these approaches to other disciplines and chronological periods are encouraged. By approaching citing and referencing issues as descriptive representation's facets, findings on this study may encourage further studies that will support Information Science and Computer Science on providing tools to become bibliographic metadata description simpler, better structured and more efficient facing the revision of descriptive representation actually in progress.