论文标题

恒星形成系统中的磁场(II):检查灰尘极化,Zeeman效应和法拉第旋转量作为磁场示踪剂

Magnetic fields in star-forming systems (II): examining dust polarization, the Zeeman effect, and the Faraday rotation measure as magnetic field tracers

论文作者

Reissl, Stefan, Stutz, Amelia M., Klessen, Ralf S., Seifried, Daniel, Walch, Stefanie

论文摘要

星际介质中云和细丝的形成和演变受磁场调节的程度仍然是一个开放的问题。然而,田地的基本特性(强度和3D形态)不容易观察到。我们研究了从Silcc-Zoom磁性水力学(MHD)细丝模拟中恢复尘埃效应,Zeeman效应和Faraday旋转措施($ rm $)的潜力。该对象在恒星形成开始时进行分析,其特征在于大约m/l $ \ sim 63 \ m _ {\ odot} \ pc^{ - 1} $的线质量,其质量为$ 1 \,$ pc,$ pc和一个扭结的3D磁场形态学。我们通过北极星辐射转移(RT)后处理产生合成观测,并与螺旋或扭结场形态的分析模型进行比较,以帮助解释推断出的观察性特征。我们表明,示踪剂信号源于细丝脊柱。我们发现沿着细丝的区域,其中具有视线(LOS)的角度依赖性是主要因素,而灰尘极化可能会追踪下面的扭结磁场形态。我们还发现,在回收的磁场方向上的逆转与任何特定的形态并不明确相关。与调节观察到的信号相比,与磁场结构相比,其他物理参数(例如密度或温度)是相关的,有时是显着的。我们证明了Zeeman效应和$ RM $恢复到2.1-3.4以内的视线磁场强度。我们得出的结论是,通过观察到灰尘极化,zeeman效应或$ rm $,可以在低质量系统中明确确定磁场形态,而磁场的强度可以可靠地恢复。

The degree to which the formation and evolution of clouds and filaments in the interstellar medium is regulated by magnetic fields remains an open question. Yet the fundamental properties of the fields (strength and 3D morphology) are not readily observable. We investigate the potential for recovering magnetic field information from dust polarization, the Zeeman effect, and the Faraday rotation measure ($RM$) in a SILCC-Zoom magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) filament simulation. The object is analyzed at the onset of star formation, and it is characterized by a line-mass of about M/L $\sim 63\ M_{\odot}\ pc^{-1}$ out to a radius of $1\,$pc and a kinked 3D magnetic field morphology. We generate synthetic observations via POLARIS radiative transfer (RT) post-processing, and compare with an analytical model of helical or kinked field morphology to help interpreting the inferred observational signatures. We show that the tracer signals originate close to the filament spine. We find regions along the filament where the angular-dependency with the line-of-sight (LOS) is the dominant factor and dust polarization may trace the underlying kinked magnetic field morphology. We also find that reversals in the recovered magnetic field direction are not unambiguously associated to any particular morphology. Other physical parameters, such as density or temperature, are relevant and sometimes dominant compared to the magnetic field structure in modulating the observed signal. We demonstrate that the Zeeman effect and the $RM$ recover the line-of-sight magnetic field strength to within a factor 2.1 - 3.4. We conclude that the magnetic field morphology may not be unambiguously determined in low-mass systems by observations of dust polarization, Zeeman effect, or $RM$, whereas the field strengths can be reliably recovered.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源