论文标题
使用受监测的二氧化碳对机载感染风险进行预测和回顾性建模
Predictive and retrospective modelling of airborne infection risk using monitored carbon dioxide
论文作者
论文摘要
此处的“空降”的远距离风险需要更好地理解感染,并且在当前的Covid-19大流行期间尤其紧迫。我们提出了一种确定空气传输的相对风险的方法,可以通过建模或监视的CO $ _2 $数据和室内空间内的占用水平来容易部署。对于经常或一致地被同一人群占用的空间,例如我们建立了开放式办公室或学校教室,建立了协议,以评估该正常出勤率上工作或学校的空气传播感染的绝对风险。我们提出了一种方法,可以轻松计算因常规与会者在这些空间内引起感染和剩余的预/无症状的预期二次感染数量。我们通过计算建模的开放式办公室的风险以及使用记录的小型自然通风办公室中记录的受监视数据来演示我们的模型。此外,通过从受监测的CO $ _2 $中推断出通风率,我们表明的是空气传播感染的估计值可以准确地重建;因此,在监控Co $ _2 $的空间中,应出现更明智的回顾性建模的范围。我们的建模表明,定期出席工作办公室不太可能对大流行作出重大贡献,但前提是,在有足够的通风的情况下进行相对安静的基于桌子的工作(即,至少10 \,L/S/P遵循英国指导,L/S/P),适当的卫生控制,距离控制,距离的距离,所有可减少的预示率最少的遗迹。至关重要的是,对办公室内的条件进行建模甚至适度的变化,或基于SARS-COV-2变体B1.1.7的感染性的基础估计值B1.1.7当前数据,通常会导致这样的预测,即对于办公室内的单个感染者而言,仅空降路线仅会增加一个以上的二次感染。
The risk of long range, herein `airborne', infection needs to be better understood and is especially urgent during the current COVID-19 pandemic. We present a method to determine the relative risk of airborne transmission that can be readily deployed with either modelled or monitored CO$_2$ data and occupancy levels within an indoor space. For spaces regularly, or consistently, occupied by the same group of people, e.g. an open-plan office or a school classroom, we establish protocols to assess the absolute risk of airborne infection of this regular attendance at work or school. We present a methodology to easily calculate the expected number of secondary infections arising from a regular attendee becoming infectious and remaining pre/asymptomatic within these spaces. We demonstrate our model by calculating risks for both a modelled open-plan office and by using monitored data recorded within a small naturally ventilated office. In addition, by inferring ventilation rates from monitored CO$_2$ we show that estimates of airborne infection can be accurately reconstructed; thereby offering scope for more informed retrospective modelling should outbreaks occur in spaces where CO$_2$ is monitored. Our modelling suggests that regular attendance at an office for work is unlikely to significantly contribute to the pandemic but only if relatively quiet desk-based work is carried out in the presence of adequate ventilation (i.e. at least 10\,l/s/p following UK guidance), appropriate hygiene controls, distancing measures, and that all commuting presents minimal infection risk. Crucially, modelling even moderate changes to the conditions within the office, or basing estimates for the infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 variant B1.1.7 current data, typically results in the prediction that for a single infector within the office the airborne route alone gives rises to more than one secondary infection.