论文标题
X2.2耀斑的非LTE反转:I。光球和色球中的矢量磁场
Non-LTE inversions of a confined X2.2 flare: I. Vector magnetic field in the photosphere and chromosphere
论文作者
论文摘要
在太阳大气中准确获得磁场矢量对于研究耀斑期间现场拓扑的变化和可靠地模型空间天气至关重要。我们通过将各种反转方法应用于2017年9月6日NOAA AR 12673中的X2.2耀斑来解决这个问题,将光球和色球磁场向量与来自该事件的两个数值模型的光球和色球磁场向量进行了比较。我们从Milne-Eddington(ME)和(非)局部热平衡(非LTE)反转Hinode SOT/SP FE I6301.5Å和6302.5Å获得光球场。色球场是从空间规范的弱场近似(WFA)和Ca II8542Å的非LTE反转获得的,在瑞典1-M太阳能望远镜上观察到了酥脆。在整个大气中,LTE和非LTE扣除的光谱场成分密切相关,在非LTE反转中具有更强的场和较高的温度。对于色圈场,非LTE反转与空间规范的WFA很好地相关。我们发现,在光球中,强度超过4.5 kg的强场斑块在染色器中以超过3 kg的相似浓度共同铺设。获得的场强度比数值模型高2-3倍,其浓缩和结构化的光球到脱糖层剪切接近极性反转线。 LTE和非LTE FE I反演基本上产生了相同的光电场,而ME反转未能再现Fe I处于发射中的场矢量方向。我们的反转确认了数值模型预测的通量绳脚关键的位置。但是,预处理和较低的空间分辨率导致模型中的领域较弱,比数据所示。这强调了在模型中需要更高空间分辨率以更好地限制喷发前通量绳索的需求。
Obtaining the magnetic field vector accurately in the solar atmosphere is essential for studying changes in field topology during flares and to reliably model space weather. We tackle this problem by applying various inversion methods to a confined X2.2 flare in NOAA AR 12673 on September 6, 2017, comparing the photospheric and chromospheric magnetic field vector with those from two numerical models of this event. We obtain the photospheric field from Milne-Eddington (ME) and (non-)local thermal equilibrium (non-LTE) inversions of Hinode SOT/SP Fe I 6301.5Å and 6302.5Å. The chromospheric field is obtained from a spatially-regularised weak field approximation (WFA) and non-LTE inversions of Ca II 8542Å observed with CRISP at the Swedish 1-m Solar Telescope. The LTE- and non-LTE-inferred photospheric field components are strongly correlated throughout the atmosphere, with stronger field and higher temperatures in the non-LTE inversions. For the chromospheric field, the non-LTE inversions correlate well with the spatially-regularised WFA. We find strong-field patches of over 4.5 kG in the photosphere, co-located with similar concentrations exceeding 3 kG in the chromosphere. The obtained field strengths are up to 2-3 times higher than in the numerical models, with more concentrated and structured photosphere-to-chromosphere shear close to the polarity inversion line. The LTE and non-LTE Fe I inversions yield essentially the same photospheric field, while ME inversions fail to reproduce the field vector orientation where Fe I is in emission. Our inversions confirm the locations of flux rope footpoints that are predicted by numerical models. However, pre-processing and lower spatial resolution lead to weaker and smoother field in the models than what the data indicate. This emphasises the need for higher spatial resolution in the models to better constrain pre-eruptive flux ropes.