论文标题
物理风格的适应低参数神经网络天气预报
Physics-inspired adaptions to low-parameter neural network weather forecasts systems
论文作者
论文摘要
最近,关于数据驱动的天气预报系统的研究激增,尤其是基于卷积神经网络(CNN)的应用程序。这些通常是针对常规纬度尺度网格表示的大气数据训练,忽略了地球的曲率。我们评估了用适当的卷积操作替换标准卷积操作的好处,该操作考虑了基础数据的几何形状(Spherenet卷积),特别是在极点附近。此外,我们评估了包括地球两个半球“翻转”特性的信息的效果,例如,旋转方向相反的旋风中的旋风 - 旋转到网络的结构中。两种方法都是物理知识的机器学习的示例。这些方法以$ \ sim1.4^{\ circ} $的分辨率在WeatherBench数据集上进行了测试,该分辨率比以前在CNNS上进行天气预报的许多研究高。在大多数提货时间+10的大多数时间+10的时间为500 HPA地球电位和850 HPA温度,我们发现使用Spherenet卷积或包括半球特异性信息可以单独提高预测技能。结合两种方法通常具有最高的预测技能。我们的Spherenet版本灵活地实现,并符合高分辨率数据集,但仍然比标准卷积操作贵得多。最后,我们分析了高预测误差的案例。这些主要发生在冬季,并且在网络的不同训练实现中相对一致,指出依赖流动性的大气可预测性。
Recently, there has been a surge of research on data-driven weather forecasting systems, especially applications based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). These are usually trained on atmospheric data represented on regular latitude-longitude grids, neglecting the curvature of the Earth. We assess the benefit of replacing the standard convolution operations with an adapted convolution operation which takes into account the geometry of the underlying data (Spherenet convolution), specifically near the poles. Additionally, we assess the effect of including the information that the two hemispheres of the Earth have "flipped" properties - for example cyclones circulating in opposite directions - into the structure of the network. Both approaches are examples of physics-informed machine learning. The methods are tested on the WeatherBench dataset, at a resolution of $\sim1.4^{\circ}$ which is higher than many previous studies on CNNs for weather forecasting. For most lead times up to day +10 for 500 hPa geopotential and 850 hPa temperature, we find that using Spherenet convolution or including hemisphere-specific information individually lead to improvement in forecast skill. Combining the two methods typically gives the highest forecast skill. Our version of Spherenet is implemented flexibly and scales well to high resolution datasets, but is still significantly more expensive than a standard convolution operation. Finally, we analyze cases with high forecast error. These occur mainly in winter, and are relatively consistent across different training realizations of the networks, pointing to flow-dependent atmospheric predictability.