论文标题

银河系微QuaSar中的高频准周期振荡和黑洞自旋估计的模型

Models of high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations and black hole spin estimates in Galactic microquasars

论文作者

Kotrlová, Andrea, Šrámková, Eva, Török, Gabriel, Goluchová, Kateřina, Jiří, Horák, Straub, Odele, Lančová, Debora, Stuchlík, Zdeňek, Abramowicz, Marek

论文摘要

我们探讨了积聚磁盘中存在的非晶状体压力力对其轴对称和非轴对称环保振荡模式的频率的影响。 {我们讨论了它对高频准周期振荡模型(QPO)的影响,这些模型在三个银河微QuaSars中积聚黑洞(BHS)的X射线通量中已经观察到,GRS 1915+105+105,GRO J1655 $ -40 $ 40和40 $ 40 and Ixte J1550 $ 564 $ 564。我们专注于以前考虑的QPO模型,该模型涉及低方位数的环数模式,$ \ lvert m \ rvert \ leq 2 $,并概述了BH旋转估算的后果,$ a \ in [0,1] $。} in [0,1] $。} in [0,1] $。。另一方面,对于其他两个模型,旋转的估计上限有明显的增加。关于QPO模型的可测证性,我们发现来自检查集合的一个特定模型与数据不相容。如果微QuaSar的光谱旋转估计该指向$ a> 0.65 $的指向,则将排除另外两个QPO型号。此外,如果确认了两个非常不同的旋转值,例如$ a \ y \ 0.65 $ j1655 $ - $ 40 vs. $ a \ $ a \约1 $ in grs 1915+105,则被确认,除了我们的结果不支持所有模型。最后,我们讨论了在中子星(NS)QPO的背景下最近提出的一种模型的含义,作为基于磁盘振荡的相对论进动模型的修改。该模型提供了NS数据的总体更好拟合,并预测了与相对论预动力模型相比,NS质量的更现实的值。我们得出结论,这也意味着微QuaSar的BH旋转的上限显着上限($ a \ sim 0.75 $ vs. $ a \ sim 0.55 $)。

We explore the influence of non-geodesic pressure forces that are present in an accretion disk on the frequencies of its axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric epicyclic oscillation modes. {We discuss its implications for models of high-frequency quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) that have been observed in the X-ray flux of accreting black holes (BHs) in the three Galactic microquasars, GRS 1915+105, GRO J1655$-$40 and XTE J1550$-$564. We focus on previously considered QPO models that deal with low azimuthal number epicyclic modes, $\lvert m \rvert \leq 2$, and outline the consequences for the estimations of BH spin, $a\in[0,1]$.} For four out of six examined models, we find only small, rather insignificant changes compared to the geodesic case. For the other two models, on the other hand, there is a fair increase of the estimated upper limit on the spin. Regarding the QPO model's falsifiability, we find that one particular model from the examined set is incompatible with the data. If the microquasar's spectral spin estimates that point to $a>0.65$ were fully confirmed, two more QPO models would be ruled out. Moreover, if two very different values of the spin, such as $a\approx 0.65$ in GRO J1655$-$40 vs. $a\approx 1$ in GRS 1915+105, were confirmed, all the models except one would remain unsupported by our results. Finally, we discuss the implications for a model recently proposed in the context of neutron star (NS) QPOs as a disk-oscillation-based modification of the relativistic precession model. This model provides overall better fits of the NS data and predicts more realistic values of the NS mass compared to the relativistic precession model. We conclude that it also implies a significantly higher upper limit on the microquasar's BH spin ($a\sim 0.75$ vs. $a\sim 0.55$).

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源