论文标题
从循环宇宙学中的混合方法中的原始标量功率谱
Primordial scalar power spectrum from the hybrid approach in loop cosmologies
论文作者
论文摘要
我们使用混合方法的有效动力学对宇宙学扰动的有效动力学进行了比较,在循环宇宙学模型中进行了量子的有效动力学,其中背景是循环量化的,但对扰动进行了量化。正在考虑的三个环路宇宙学模型是标准LQC,修饰的LQC-I(MLQC-I)和在空间平坦的Friedmann-Lema- Robertson-Walker(FLRRW)Universe的空间平坦的LQC-II(MLQC-II)中。这些模型来自对称性中的古典汉密尔顿约束的不同正规化,降低了空间,旨在捕获环路量子重力中的某些量化特征。当将技术在混合方法中应用于MLQC-I/II时,我们发现有效的Mukhanov-Sasaki方程的形式与LQC相同。这三个模型之间的差异是在每个模型中有效质量的唯一表达式中编码的。我们发现,LQC和MLQC-II之间功率谱幅度的相对差异约为$ 50 \%$ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $,而MLQC-I和LQC-I和LQC/MLQC-II之间的差异可能高达$ 100 \%$ $。有趣的是,在MLQC-I的红外和振荡状态下,我们从远低于普朗克量表的混合方法中获得了抑制功率谱。该结果与从打扮度的度量方法获得的扰动形成鲜明对比,在这种扰动中,该制度中相应的振幅极大。我们的分析表明,尽管LQC和MLQC-II的两种方法之间的现象学预测是一致的,但对于MLQC-I,穿着和混合方法之间的差异可能非常重要。我们的结果提供了第一个强大的证据,证明由于各自的基础结构,穿着和混合方法之间的预测差异。
We compare the primordial scalar power spectra in the loop cosmological models using the effective dynamics of the hybrid approach to cosmological perturbations in which the background is loop quantized but the perturbations are Fock quantized. The three loop cosmological models under consideration are the standard LQC, the modified LQC-I (mLQC-I) and the modified LQC-II (mLQC-II) in the spatially flat Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) universe with a Starobinsky potential. These models arise from different regularizations of the classical Hamiltonian constraint in the symmetry reduced spacetimes and aim to capture certain features of quantization in loop quantum gravity. When applying the techniques in the hybrid approach to mLQC-I/II, we find the effective Mukhanov-Sasaki equations take the same form as in LQC. The difference among the three models is encoded in the unique expressions of the effective masses in each model. We find that the relative difference in the amplitude of power spectrum between LQC and mLQC-II is approximately $50\%$ in the infrared and the oscillatory regimes, whereas this difference can be as large as $100\%$ between mLQC-I and LQC/mLQC-II. Interestingly, in the infrared and the oscillatory regimes of mLQC-I, we obtain a suppressed power spectrum from the hybrid approach which is far below the Planck scale. This result is in a striking contrast to the one obtained from dressed metric approach to perturbations where the corresponding amplitude in this regime is extremely large. Our analysis shows that while the phenomenological predictions are in agreement between two approaches for LQC and mLQC-II, for mLQC-I the differences between dressed and hybrid approaches can be quite significant. Our result provides the first robust evidence of difference in predictions between dressed and hybrid approaches due to respective underlying constructions.