论文标题
发明家和物理学家社区中集体遗忘和文化选择性的上升
The rising of collective forgetting and cultural selectivity in inventors and physicists communities
论文作者
论文摘要
忘记了这篇论文多长时间?集体遗忘是随着时间的流逝,文化作品所接受的注意力衰减的过程。最近的工作模拟了这一衰变,这是两个不同的过程的结果,一个与交流记忆有关 - 通过人类交流和文化记忆所维持的传播 - 由内容的物理记录所维持的膜。然而,关于集体忘记动态如何随着时间的变化而言,知之甚少。较旧的文化作品比新的文化遗忘了吗?在这里,我们通过关注两个知识社区:发明家和物理学家来研究集体记忆和关注的时间变化。我们使用来自美国专利商标办公室(USPTO)的专利数据以及在美国物理学会(APS)发表的物理文件来量化集体遗忘的变化如何随着时间的流逝而发生变化。该模型使我们能够区分两个忘记的分支。一个分支是短暂的,直接从交流记忆到遗忘。另一个是从沟通到文化记忆到遗忘的长期寿命。数据分析表明,随着信息的增长,两个社区的遗忘率越来越高。此外,这些知识群落似乎正在提高其在文化记忆中存储有价值的文化作品的选择性。这些发现提供了有关遗忘作为废除假设的经验确认,并表明知识社区可以有效地减慢集体忘记在提高其文化选择性方面的崛起。
How long until this paper is forgotten? Collective forgetting is the process by which the attention received by cultural pieces decays as time passes. Recent work modeled this decay as the result of two different processes, one linked to communicative memory --memories sustained by human communication-- and cultural memory --memories sustained by the physical recording of content. Yet, little is known on how the collective forgetting dynamic changes over time. Are older cultural pieces forgotten at a lower rate than newer ones? Here, we study the temporal changes of collective memory and attention by focusing on two knowledge communities: inventors and physicists. We use data on patents from the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and physics papers published in the American Physical Society (APS) to quantify how collective forgetting has changed over time. The model enables us to distinguish between two branches of forgetting. One branch is short-lived, going directly from communicative memory to oblivion. The other one is long-lived going from communicative to cultural memory and then to oblivion. The data analysis shows an increasing forgetting rate for both communities as the information grows. Furthermore, these knowledge communities seem to be increasing their selectivity at storing valuable cultural pieces in their cultural memory. These findings provide empirical confirmation on the forgetting as an annulment hypothesis and show that knowledge communities can effectively slow down the rising of collective forgetting at improving their cultural selectivity.